Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 43121 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2006 18:56:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Nov 2006 18:56:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 26154 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2006 18:56:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 26128 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2006 18:56:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 26119 invoked by uid 99); 25 Nov 2006 18:56:44 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 10:56:44 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.9.190.6] (HELO lox.whirlycott.com) (69.9.190.6) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 10:56:31 -0800 Received: (qmail 28259 invoked by uid 1016); 25 Nov 2006 18:56:10 -0000 Received: from 70.36.208.192 by lox.whirlycott.com (envelope-from , uid 1009) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.87.1/1179. Clear:RC:1(70.36.208.192):. Processed in 0.027371 secs); 25 Nov 2006 18:56:10 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: stefano@apache.org via lox.whirlycott.com X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.25 (Clear:RC:1(70.36.208.192):. Processed in 0.027371 secs) Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.100?) (stefano@ormaz.it@70.36.208.192) by lox.whirlycott.com with ESMTPA; 25 Nov 2006 18:56:10 -0000 Message-ID: <456891C7.3060508@apache.org> Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 10:56:07 -0800 From: Stefano Mazzocchi User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Macintosh/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: How can we improve comments in the source code? Was: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Alexei Fedotov wrote: > I found a way to measure quality of in-source comments using CCCC tool > http://cccc.sourceforge.net. You can check results for DRLVM at > http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12345645/cccc.zip > (please, start from .cccc/cccc.html). > > When a code with high complexity (= has high MVG) is poorly commented > (= has low COM) the ratio MVG/COM (M_C column) becomes big and is > highlighted with red. > > Stefano, > Please, don't miss another colored table. :-) you kidding? you know I'm a sucker for colored tables and charts ;-) I was already downloading it :-) > Do you know better tools to estimate a source metrics to add to Melody? I have a whole set of static analysis tools to try out, cccc was already on my list. -- Stefano.