Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 93178 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2006 02:50:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Nov 2006 02:50:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 92196 invoked by uid 500); 18 Nov 2006 02:50:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 92169 invoked by uid 500); 18 Nov 2006 02:50:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 92160 invoked by uid 500); 18 Nov 2006 02:50:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 92157 invoked by uid 99); 18 Nov 2006 02:50:57 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 18:50:57 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.9.190.6] (HELO lox.whirlycott.com) (69.9.190.6) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 18:50:44 -0800 Received: (qmail 11352 invoked by uid 1016); 18 Nov 2006 02:50:23 -0000 Received: from 70.36.208.192 by lox.whirlycott.com (envelope-from , uid 1009) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.87.1/1179. Clear:RC:1(70.36.208.192):. Processed in 0.100956 secs); 18 Nov 2006 02:50:23 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: stefano@apache.org via lox.whirlycott.com X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.25 (Clear:RC:1(70.36.208.192):. Processed in 0.100956 secs) Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.100?) (stefano@ormaz.it@70.36.208.192) by lox.whirlycott.com with ESMTPA; 18 Nov 2006 02:50:22 -0000 Message-ID: <455E74EB.5070309@apache.org> Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 18:50:19 -0800 From: Stefano Mazzocchi User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Macintosh/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [heads up] the importance of 'reversed' API completion Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org As shown in the graphical history of harmony at http://67.86.14.213:10000/harmony.png we are currently at 96.39% of API completion (if we don't count the SerialID differences and the final static values), and we are continuously growing there. But there is also another index, the "reversed" API completion that measures how much code the RI didn't implement that we did. Here, a 100% means that all that code that we have implemented in those public packages is available in the RI. In order to achieve WORA, the TCK mandates that both direct and reverse completion be 100%. I suggest we start to pay attention to both. Here is a reverse-japi report: http://67.86.14.213:10000/results/latest/reverse-japi.html -- Stefano.