Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 92398 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2006 23:19:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Nov 2006 23:19:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 97826 invoked by uid 500); 15 Nov 2006 23:19:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 97798 invoked by uid 500); 15 Nov 2006 23:19:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 97789 invoked by uid 99); 15 Nov 2006 23:19:57 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 15:19:57 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: 216.86.168.178 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of geir@pobox.com) Received: from [216.86.168.178] (HELO mxout-03.mxes.net) (216.86.168.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 15:19:43 -0800 Received: from [192.168.1.104] (unknown [67.86.14.213]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B65E05193C for ; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:19:21 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <455BA088.7000801@pobox.com> Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:19:36 -0500 From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." Reply-To: geir@pobox.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Macintosh/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [drlvm][unit] 100% of class library tests pass References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Be sure to not miss anyone :) This was a great community effort, with everyone pitching in. DRLVM is now a full peer to J9 in Harmony testing. :) We still need to use J9 (and another VM that happens to work with our classlibrary), as a sanity check, but we should from now on use DRLVM in our CI testing framework. geir Alexei Fedotov wrote: > Oops, I've missed: > * Andrew Zhang for reviewing class library patches and helpful discussions > > On 11/16/06, Alexei Fedotov wrote: >> >> Folks, >> According to http://harmonytest.org, today 100% of class library unit >> tests pass on DRLVM. Thank you all! It takes 44 days for the great >> team we are. Thanks for your thoughtful, diligent work and deep >> inspiration. Kudos to you for the following (and not limited to this): >> >> * Alexey Varlamov and Elena for driving the whole process >> * Anton and Vladimir Ivanov for automating test runs >> * Geir and Gregory for checking and committing related DRLVM patches >> * Paulex, Tim, Nathan, Stepan and Mikhail Loenko for checking and >> committing related class library patches >> * Alexey Petrenko for becoming ICU expert and writing good JIRA issue >> resolution guidelines >> * Alexei Zakharov for resolving class library test issues >> * Ilya Okomin, Denis Kishenko, Oleg Khaschansky and Alexey Ivanov for >> fixing class library and tests* Ivan, Egor, Mikhail Fursov, Nikolay >> Sidelnikov and Alexander Astapchuk for making execution engines work >> * Tatiana and Maxim for filing JIRA issues about test failures >> * Nikolay Kuznetsov for completing thread interruption handling and >> reverting consequences of park/unpark integration >> * Pavel Afremov for fixing exception handling >> * Boris Kuznetsov for intelligent fixing of security tests >> * Rana and Salikh for evaluating and discussing problems, reviewing >> and trying DRLVM patches >> * Pavel Pervov and Evgueni for help with DRLVM patches >> * Artem for discovering and fixing weird Windows* behavior >> * My wife for bringing hot tea to the computer during sleepless nights >> >> There are still open issues with reliability, multiprocessor and other >> special configurations, so the page >> http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Unit_Tests_Pass_on_DRLVM remains >> active. But this shouldn't prevent us from including class library >> testing into Harmony "zero regression" policy. What do you think? >> >> -- >> Thank you, >> Alexei > > >