Return-Path: 
 <harmony-dev-return-18928-apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 73672 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2006 17:27:39 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Nov 2006 17:27:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 35424 invoked by uid 500); 14 Nov 2006 17:27:46 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 35383 invoked by uid 500); 14 Nov 2006 17:27:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <harmony-dev.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 35374 invoked by uid 99); 14 Nov 2006 17:27:46 -0000
Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 09:27:46 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: 216.86.168.178 is neither permitted
 nor denied by domain of geir@pobox.com)
Received: from [216.86.168.178] (HELO mxout-03.mxes.net) (216.86.168.178)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 09:27:32 -0800
Received: from [10.2.8.45] (unknown [209.125.57.70])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A24EF51933
	for <harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org>; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:27:09 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4559FC7C.8020702@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:27:24 -0500
From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." <geir@pobox.com>
Reply-To: geir@pobox.com
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Macintosh/20061025)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [doc] site.css
References: <8E389A5F2FEABA4CB1DEC35A25CB39CE6E6660@mssmsx411>
In-Reply-To: <8E389A5F2FEABA4CB1DEC35A25CB39CE6E6660@mssmsx411>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org



Ivanov, Alexey A wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I've updated formatting of definition lists <DL> on site: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2173
> 
> The new formatting looks more natural to me; the screenshots can be found in the JIRA issue.

yes, that looks better.

> 
> 
> When editing site.css I faced that there are many different styles of indentation used:
>     * Some statements are indented using tabs,
>     * Some -- using spaces,
>     * And a mixture of tabs and space, in the worse case.
> 
> There are also inconsistencies in formatting of rules, and trailing white-space.
> 
> Let's agree on using either tabs or spaces for indentation of CSS statements. If they are different, it causes inconveniences when creating patches because some lines look changed while nothing was modified there.
> 
> I have no strong opinion on which one to use here. But let it be one: either tabs or spaces.
> 
> What do you think about it?

I think that since I don't have the first clue about css, and don't 
intend do it, you can choose :)

That said, I think that spaces are the right way - it's consistent w/ 
our other source formatting policies.

geir


> 
> 
> Thank you in advance,
> --
> Alexey A. Ivanov
> Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
>