Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of nbeyer@gmail.com designates
 66.249.82.230 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=g21PeLuhNmUhY8EYssHbe5gB/wCeRn/yMv3n7hOE8htdG1NuLxm3xK/XRB5HccIRtVFgtvB1I6WJJ7fD6VQz3jXz+0/QsW0mh15YwQsYJXGVLLbZwon7BUqfMkaBQyCqAkF2qwXyuqPg14ZtKKzNUHlYQ8GUZwCn/jKSHCrJqY0=
Message-ID: <3b3f27c60611281823g659f8e00x7e4b0bfb02bc4ea4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 20:23:35 -0600
From: "Nathan Beyer" <nbeyer@gmail.com>
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: [classlib][tests] Refactoring breakage
In-Reply-To: <456C3EDC.8050408@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <456C22AA.6020906@gmail.com>
	 <6e47b64f0611280442i23d3fa38q2087747b0dce880c@mail.gmail.com>
	 <456C37C1.9000601@gmail.com>
	 <6e47b64f0611280528k1d145c0cw46ec5ea200e09fa@mail.gmail.com>
	 <456C3EDC.8050408@gmail.com>

After looking through the logs. It seems these 'accessibility' tests
were just added around Aug 3rd. The Eclipse IDE artifacts aren't even
updated to reflect their existence. Prior to this the tests were in
the "awt_swing_modules".

Looking at the tests, most of them don't even use the functionality in
the BasicSwingTestCase. Some do use a few of the inner classes of
BasicSwingTestCase, but these should really be factored out, as they
are completely independent. I'm going to go through these tests and
clean them up to be as isolated as the module is.

Also, the 'support' project's manifest isn't exporting all of the it's
packagings, so the other project's can't see the classes, at least
within the Eclipse IDE. If the OSGi manifests and the Eclipse
artifacts aren't going to be maintained, should we just get rid of
them? The only place they are used is inside of Eclipse for
developers.

-Nathan

On 11/28/06, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:
> Stepan Mishura wrote:
> > On 11/28/06, Tim Ellison wrote:
> >>
> >> Stepan Mishura wrote:
> >> > I agree with moving it back to 'support'. Tim, are you working on this
> >> > (just to avoid duplicate work)?
> >>
> >> No I'm not.  I was going to let Nathan comment, and if necessary fix,
> >> since he made the change.  If it is a blocker that cannot wait for the
> >> next couple of hours then you/I/anyone can take a look at it.
> >
> > I'd consider it as a blocker cause the classlib build is broken.
>
> Ok, I'll fix it.  It will take 40 mins or so because I'll have to run
> all the tests again (hint, hint :-) )
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
> --
>
> Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com)
> IBM Java technology centre, UK.
>