Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of gshimansky@gmail.com
 designates 66.249.92.174 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id;
        b=KAfu3HxqzWU2OY2LwIuvfUllx8pl2y6M282qZnBSXtKBq6ZaXSeeT/4tXFin+G/JMv5YoHsXPNJsScIDXqBH5gWzrjEuQuED59Ys0Wz8emz4nu4Q8MWbzI5OriD1cBBkRCzLOtE3M6JkeDPWU2BaSoMUe159BNslFVz4v7pgMi4=
From: Gregory Shimansky <gshimansky@gmail.com>
Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [drlvm][em64t] build fails
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 03:12:50 +0300
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
References: <4554E6B2.7090001@apache.org>
 <200611110153.19120.gshimansky@gmail.com>
 <e0f125db0611101536y635d7f81lfe5af4ef4278424a@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <e0f125db0611101536y635d7f81lfe5af4ef4278424a@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200611110312.50644.gshimansky@gmail.com>

On Saturday 11 November 2006 02:36 Pavel Pervov wrote:
> Gregory,
>
> Could you look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2152. I
> believe it'll fix the build.

Thank you for a quick fix. The build works now. Don't try to run acceptance 
tests though. The StackTest is a machine killer. It eats all of the virtual 
memory in a moment because it cannot find any stack limit ("ulimit -s 8192" 
may be used as a workaround) and maps all of 2^48 (or whatever number of bits 
are configured in kernel for virtual address space) bytes of virtual memory. 
After that only reset helps.

> On 11/11/06, Gregory Shimansky <gshimansky@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Saturday 11 November 2006 01:43 Weldon Washburn wrote:
> > > On 11/10/06, Gregory Shimansky <gshimansky@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Same for me. I saw this yesterday. It is because HARMONY-1558 has
> >
> > changed
> >
> > > Sorry about that.  I looked at Stefano's error messages.  They are very
> > > similar to the ones we battled a few days ago on linux 32-bit platform.
> > > Pavel Pervov can probably tell you exactly what needs to be fixed.
> >
> > I think I can figure out myself just looking at what changes in the patch
> > were
> > done to Class::managed_null and Class::name.
> >
> > There is no reason for excuses. You did a very good job with a patch that
> > big,
> > it is good enough we didn't break anything on ia32 with it :)
> >
> > > I probably need access to a Linux 64-bit machine so that build problems
> > > like this get fixed *before* committing.
> >
> > I'll try to check my commits on x86_64 too once in a while.

-- 
Gregory Shimansky, Intel Middleware Products Division