+1 for dumping GCv4 --- I got carried away and forgot to vote!

On 11/1/06, Weldon Washburn <weldonwjw@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/1/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
> >
> > Is there any reason to keep this around in the main branch?
>
>
> Actually, this brings up something I have been meaning to do for a few
> days -- ask for volunteer(s) to help with the MMTk port.  It turns out that
> the current MMTk port depends on the underlying GC to create a 450MB
> array.  This big array is used as MMTk's "user-level" java heap.  The
> solution of course is to dump GCV4 and also complete the MMTk port.
>
> It seems I am spending most of my time committing drlvm patches,
> discussing VM architecture issues and dealing with stability issues.  It
> does not look like I will get around to working on MMTk port for a while :(
> However, I can certainly show volunteers how to pick up the MMTk port and
> run with it :)  Basically what needs to be done is in the email of Oct 23
> titled, "[DRLVM][MMTk] current status and plan".  I will run a seperate
> email asking for volunteers to work on MMTk port.
>
> --
> Weldon Washburn
> Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
>



-- 
Weldon Washburn
Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division