From harmony-dev-return-18338-apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Wed Nov 08 02:39:14 2006 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 47588 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2006 02:39:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Nov 2006 02:39:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 57493 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2006 02:39:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 57460 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2006 02:39:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 57430 invoked by uid 99); 8 Nov 2006 02:39:15 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:39:14 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [130.56.64.71] (HELO messaging1.anu.edu.au) (130.56.64.71) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:38:58 -0800 Received: from [150.203.163.99] by messaging1.anu.edu.au (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-7.05 (built Sep 5 2006)) with ESMTP id <0J8E001UI4OC3530@messaging1.anu.edu.au> for harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 13:38:36 +1100 (EST) Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 13:39:31 +1100 From: Robin Garner Subject: Re: [drlvm][sablevm] Desing of Class Unloading Support In-reply-to: <4dd1f3f00611070913r2e942ca3r5955c20dde33af4a@mail.gmail.com> To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Message-id: <45514363.2090600@anu.edu.au> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <5836de490610240251p120dfa56x736fbb5eb1898aca@mail.gmail.com> <12385bbd0610311259m1012cdadl4f9452dc336dbac7@mail.gmail.com> <4547BC2B.2080600@sablevm.org> <51d555c70610311454s24d2089cx7eeb9af17d7ebfaf@mail.gmail.com> <5836de490610312117s7ca8230dxcf61a3a13c4643c7@mail.gmail.com> <12385bbd0611031329o17133487h8e0e0af89d304fc4@mail.gmail.com> <12385bbd0611070419t5b3512beu65504bd83e5302f2@mail.gmail.com> <4dd1f3f00611070913r2e942ca3r5955c20dde33af4a@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060918) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Weldon Washburn wrote: > On 11/7/06, Ivan Volosyuk wrote: >> >> On 07 Nov 2006 14:35:55 +0600, Egor Pasko wrote: >> > > I already have one idea how to benefit from movable vtables. > > > There would have to be a very compelling argument for making vtables > movable. Like a business workload that Harmony needs to run within the > next > 12 months. The cost of moving vtables would be huge. It would have to be a very hefty optimization :) -- Robin Garner Dept. of Computer Science Australian National University