harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Egor Pasko <egor.pa...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [performance] a few early benchmarks
Date Thu, 23 Nov 2006 13:44:23 GMT
On the 0x22A day of Apache Harmony Alexey Petrenko wrote:
> 2006/11/23, Mikhail Loenko <mloenko@gmail.com>:
> > 23 Nov 2006 16:34:22 +0600, Egor Pasko <egor.pasko@gmail.com>:
> > > On the 0x22A day of Apache Harmony Alexey Petrenko wrote:
> > > > 2006/11/23, Vladimir Strigun <vstrigun@gmail.com>:
> > > > > On 23 Nov 2006 14:37:09 +0600, Egor Pasko <egor.pasko@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > On the 0x22A day of Apache Harmony Vladimir Strigun wrote:
> > > > > > > The numbers that I published was received on P4 under Windows
+
> > > > > > > server.emconf +Harmony-1980. Unfortunately I haven't run
Dacapo under
> > > > > > > x86_64, but I hope we could receive almost the same range
(10-20 %
> > > > > > > slower that Sun) with the mentioned configuration.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And Sun was running with "-server" too I guess? :)
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, of course.
> > > > >
> > > > > > Maybe, it is time to track performance comparisons of *different
> > > > > > platforms* in one place? That should help to avoid major differences
in
> > > > > > our visions for harmony performance.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, good idea. Should we define the configuration for all VM's as
well?
> > > > > For instance, for Sun we could use parameters from spec site. What
do
> > > > > you think about it?
> > > > +1 for options from spec site.
> > >
> > > I am in love with it too. We could present results similar to how
> > > spec.org does. Just a list of runs.
> > > For each:
> > > * revision number
> > > * hardware/os summary (number of cores)
> > > * link to full details
> > +1
> >
> > > * more?
> >
> > score? :)

oops :)

> Scores are most visible things but we can not easily publish them for
> all specs...

not allowed -> won't publish. We have great free benchmarks (thanks to
DaCapo guys!), they will give us a good picture.

> For example: http://www.spec.org/jbb2005/docs/FAQ.html#Qpublish
> == cut ===
> Q15
> How can I publish SPECjbb2005 results?
> 
> A15
> You need to get a SPECjbb2005 license in order to publish results.
> For more information about submitting results, please contact SPEC.
> == cut ===
> Another link on SPECjbb2005:
> http://www.spec.org/jbb2005/docs/RunRules.html#_Toc102806116
> This question need more investigation.
> 
> Anyway I think that we should define suite list first.
> 
> SY, Alexey

[snip]

-- 
Egor Pasko


Mime
View raw message