harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexey Varlamov" <alexey.v.varla...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [classlib][luni]serialize a non pulbic class
Date Thu, 23 Nov 2006 09:04:28 GMT
I do not follow why we need serialization compatiblity here?
The j.l.Builder itself is not serializable, nor a Process
implementation for obvious reason - I don't think we should care about
env either.

--
Alexey

2006/11/23, Richard <richard.liangyx@gmail.com>:
> Tony Wu wrote:
> > I generated the golden file by RI and got the testcase[1] below failed
> > on Harmony.
> > In general, we should implement a class whose name/package is
> > completely same as RI for serialization compatiblity, but the
> > customized Map  is not a public class.(i.e. I'm not able get the class
> > name from spec.) Is it proper to print the name by getClass.getName()
> > and follow RI here?
> >
> > [1]
> >  public void testSerializationCompatibility() throws Exception {
> >        ProcessBuilder pb = new ProcessBuilder("Arg1", "Arg2", "Arg3");
> >        Map<String, String> env = pb.environment();
> >        SerializationTest.verifyGolden(this, env);
> >    }
> >
> >
> >
> IMHO, we shall use the same class name.
>
> --
> Richard Liang
> China Development Lab, IBM
>
>

Mime
View raw message