harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexey Varlamov" <alexey.v.varla...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [drlvm][unit] 100% of class library tests pass
Date Thu, 16 Nov 2006 07:18:14 GMT
2006/11/16, Mikhail Loenko <mloenko@gmail.com>:
> why not?
But what benefit it would bring? build test in DRLVM takes too much
time already, I'm afraid people will just stop using it :(

This is analogous to enforcing full testing in classlib for every
change regardless of module. Evidently this is too expensive.

>
> 2006/11/16, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com>:
> >
> >
> > Pavel Ozhdikhin wrote:
> > > On 11/16/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Be sure to not miss anyone :)  This was a great community effort, with
> > >> everyone pitching in.
> > >>
> > >> DRLVM is now a full peer  to J9 in Harmony testing.  :)  We still need
> > >> to use J9 (and another VM that happens to work with our classlibrary),
> > >> as a sanity check, but we should from now on use DRLVM in our CI testing
> > >> framework.
> > >
> > >
> > > On the other hand, to make sure DRLVM has no regressions regarding
> > > to Classlibrary Unit Tests it makes sense to add these tests to the "test"
> > > target of DRLVM build.
> > > What do people think?
> >
> > Adding classlib unit tests to DRLVM test target?  No thanks :)
> >
> > geir
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Pavel
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> geir
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Alexei Fedotov wrote:
> > >> > Oops, I've missed:
> > >> > * Andrew Zhang for reviewing class library patches and helpful
> > >> discussions
> > >> >
> > >> > On 11/16/06, Alexei Fedotov <alexei.fedotov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Folks,
> > >> >> According to http://harmonytest.org, today 100% of class library
unit
> > >> >> tests pass on DRLVM. Thank you all! It takes 44 days for the great
> > >> >> team we are. Thanks for your thoughtful, diligent work and deep
> > >> >> inspiration. Kudos to you for the following (and not limited to
this):
> > >> >>
> > >> >> * Alexey Varlamov and Elena for driving the whole process
> > >> >> * Anton and Vladimir Ivanov for automating test runs
> > >> >> * Geir and Gregory for checking and committing related DRLVM patches
> > >> >> * Paulex, Tim, Nathan, Stepan and Mikhail Loenko for checking
and
> > >> >> committing related class library patches
> > >> >> * Alexey Petrenko for becoming ICU expert and writing good JIRA
issue
> > >> >> resolution guidelines
> > >> >> * Alexei Zakharov for resolving class library test issues
> > >> >> * Ilya Okomin, Denis Kishenko, Oleg Khaschansky and Alexey Ivanov
for
> > >> >> fixing class library and tests* Ivan, Egor, Mikhail Fursov, Nikolay
> > >> >> Sidelnikov and Alexander Astapchuk for making execution engines
work
> > >> >> * Tatiana and Maxim for filing JIRA issues about test failures
> > >> >> * Nikolay Kuznetsov for completing thread interruption handling
and
> > >> >> reverting consequences of park/unpark integration
> > >> >> * Pavel Afremov for fixing exception handling
> > >> >> * Boris Kuznetsov for intelligent fixing of security tests
> > >> >> * Rana and Salikh for evaluating and discussing problems, reviewing
> > >> >> and trying DRLVM patches
> > >> >> * Pavel Pervov and Evgueni for help with DRLVM patches
> > >> >> * Artem for discovering and fixing weird Windows* behavior
> > >> >> * My wife for bringing hot tea to the computer during sleepless
nights
> > >> >>
> > >> >> There are still open issues with reliability, multiprocessor and
other
> > >> >> special configurations, so the page
> > >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Unit_Tests_Pass_on_DRLVM  remains
> > >> >> active. But this shouldn't prevent us from including class library
> > >> >> testing into Harmony "zero regression" policy. What do you think?
> > >> >>
> > >> >> --
> > >> >> Thank you,
> > >> >> Alexei
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> >
>

Mime
View raw message