harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexey Varlamov" <alexey.v.varla...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Harmony passes 94% on derby tests.
Date Fri, 03 Nov 2006 08:12:05 GMT
+1 to integration. As for the patches, I'd rather suggest filing bugs
on EUT and let respective community to resolve those issue for good -
either find more universal approach (like java.management or JVMTI
features) or hardcode harmony too :).

Thanks for spending these efforts, anyway!

03 Nov 2006 14:01:14 +0600, Egor Pasko <egor.pasko@gmail.com>:
> On the 0x215 day of Apache Harmony Nina Rinskaya wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I might have chosen the wrong thread for this message, but this is
> > about another well-known unit tests suite - Eclipse Unit Tests. I've
> > recently filed new JIRA issue
> > (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2038) with the ant
> > script to run EUT on Harmony. Does it make sense to integrate it to
> > the buildtest module?
>
> I think, yes!
>
> > For a moment EUT pass rate on Harmony is ~77%. EUT runs results (on
> > Linux/ia32 and windows/ia32) are being updated on wiki:
> > http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Eclipse_Unit_Tests_Pass_on_DRLVM
> >
> > A number of EUT test cases fail on Harmony because EUT uses some
> > hard-coded Sun/Jrockit classlibs names. In particular,
> > org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.util.Util class uses specific paths to
> > class libraries jar files (<JRE_HOME>/lib/rt.jar, for example).
> > org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.runtime.*VMLauncher classes use "javaw" as
> > vm executable name that is missing in Harmony bundle. So what I would
> > like to do now is to patch EUT to invoke Harmony correctly if it is ok
> > with everyone here.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Nina
> >
> > On 10/25/06, Vladimir Ivanov <ivavladimir@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Excellent!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I have one more idea: we already have buildtest module. Some time ago we
> > > agreed to extends it by coverage and japi scripts (I hope it happens soon:)
> > > ). May be we extend it one more time and store here some scripts for
> > > automatic run of other-projects unit tests? Seems, in this case we can
> > > easily reproduce tests run and enable new platforms.
> > >
> > > Of cause, we can not cover all application but we can define some list of
> > > 'most important application'.
> > >
> > > Is it OK?
> > >
> > > Leo, could you share your script for Derby?
> > >
> > > Tony, could you share your scripts for ant and log4j?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  thanks, Vladimir
> > >
> > >
> > > PS. The directory structure may be something like that:
> > > builtest
> > >     - trunk
> > >         - cc
> > >         - coverage
> > >         - japi
> > >         - application_test
> > >             - derby
> > >             - ant
> > >             - etc
> > >         - misc (some other scripts)
> > > On 10/25/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Nice work!
> > > >
> > > > More inline..
> > > >
> > > > Leo Li wrote:
> > > > > 467 Tests Run
> > > > > 94% Pass (443 tests passed)
> > > > > 6% Fail (24 tests failed)
> > > > > 5 Suites skipped
> > > > >
> > > > > The main progress focuses here:
> > > > > 1. Harmony classlib fails to load class when user-defined security
> > > > policy
> > > > > exists. It is due to the sequence of library loading of VM, which
has
> > > > been
> > > > > resolved now.
> > > > > 2. A new workround for derby tests which allow useprocess to run
test or
> > > > > else several testcases might fail due to derby lack these tests when
> > > > > useprocess = false.
> > > > > 3. Derby source code uses the version and the name of java vm to
decide
> > > > > what
> > > > > to do, while current IBM VM has the version of "1.4.2" and the name
of
> > > > > "j9",
> > > > > which has different output on the screen from that of standard RI
1.5.
> > > > At
> > > > > the same time Derby test compares the output of the iteractive test
> > > > scripts
> > > > > to that of expected. I have made some slight modification in its
source
> > > > > code, but I have not throughly change this odd behavior, ...,too
much:(
> > > >
> > > > Have you approached the derby community with the changes?
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Besides, some testcase fails even on RI. I exclude
> > > > > a "derbynetclientmats" test suit since it will hang both RI and Harmony.
> > > > > Currently all the failure is irrelevant to Harmony. Hope I can find
> > > > > something in the left.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have updated the wiki of derby on Hamony:
> > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Apache_Derby.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> --
> Egor Pasko
>
>

Mime
View raw message