harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Elena Semukhina" <elena.semukh...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Please set a "Patch available" flag for H-1669 Was: [drlvm] [testing] Excluding commit tests until the problem is fixed
Date Tue, 14 Nov 2006 08:31:05 GMT
On 11/14/06, Fedotov, Alexei A <alexei.a.fedotov@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Elena,
>
> Could you please set "Patch available" flag for the following issue to
> attract committer's attention to this issue?
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1669 Classlib test
> tests/api/java/io/PipedInputStreamTest hangs on Windows 2003
>
> (After the last JIRA configuration changes a submitter can edit her
> issues).


Done!

With best regards,
> Alexei Fedotov,
> Intel Java & XML Engineering
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Elena Semukhina [mailto:elena.semukhina@gmail.com]
> >Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 3:56 PM
> >To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >Subject: Re: [drlvm] [testing] Excluding commit tests until the problem
> is
> >fixed
> >
> >On 10/17/06, Gregory Shimansky <gshimansky@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> My 2003 server is installed on a single core P4 with HT. The test
> >attached
> >> to HARMONY-1669 works fine for me both with and without patch :)
> >>
> >> I may get an access to dual core server as described in JIRA but I am
> >> afraid
> >> it will take a few days. Probably we can just apply the patch since
> it
> >> doesn't seem to do any harm.
> >
> >
> >Indeed the attached test passes and PipedInputStream test passes being
> run
> >separately now but when I ran the whole luni module, it hung. I applied
> the
> >patch and it helped.
> >
> >2006/10/17, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com>:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Rana Dasgupta wrote:
> >> > > On 10/16/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> So since I don't have Win 2003, I gotta just commit and let
> someone
> >> > else
> >> > >> test?
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Any committer have win 2003?
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > I think that it may be hard to find a test at this point that
> fails
> >on
> >> > > Windows Server 2003, but passes on XP. But perf etc.
> characteristics
> >> > > will be
> >> > > different. At some point, gc_v5 etc. is likely to have server
> >specific
> >> > > variations, eg., parallel gc may be on server only.
> >> > >
> >> > > Are we talking of tests in general? I am sorry, but I may not
> have
> >> > > understood the comment.
> >> >
> >> > There is a test that demonstrates a Win 2003 bug...  I can just
> commit
> >> > it and let someone confirm since I don't have a win 2003 machine
> >> >
> >> > geir
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Gregory Shimansky, Intel Middleware Products Division
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >--
> >Thanks,
> >Elena
>



-- 
Thanks,
Elena

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message