harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Leo Li" <liyilei1...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [general] longer term roadmap
Date Mon, 27 Nov 2006 02:37:15 GMT
 Seems we are keeping pace with RI.:)

On 11/27/06, spark shen <smallsmallorgan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Andrew Zhang 写道:
> > On 11/27/06, Nathan Beyer <nbeyer@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> I don't have a problem with these timelines. I think we probably need
> >> to start formalizing these plans a bit more. Perhaps set a target for
> >> a release candidate release of May. Also, I think this coincides
> >> nicely with establishing our branching/tagging policy (branch for JDK
> >> 5, trunk for JDK 6 and tags for each release, etc).
> >
> >
> > Branching/tagging sounds great! so that people can start contribuiting
> > right
> > away if they're interested in jdk6. :)
> +100.
> And I am interested in implementing J2SE 6 new feature.
> Best regards
> >
> > -Nathan
> >>
> >> On 11/26/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
> >> > I noticed that I've said the following several times, and it's really
> >> > not for me to say, but for us to say.
> >> >
> >> > Does anyone have a problem with the following "high-level" time line?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Mid 2007 : Java SE 5
> >> >
> >> > End 2007 : Java SE 6 (meaning we have to start thinking about Java
> >> SE 6
> >> > classlib changes...)
> >> >
> >> > End 2008 : Java SE 7 (this really means "we'll do Java SE 7 when Sun
> >> > does Java SE 7...")
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > geir
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>


-- 
Leo Li
China Software Development Lab, IBM

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message