harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Leo Li" <liyilei1...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [classlib]Harmony passes 100% testcases of Tomcat5.5
Date Wed, 01 Nov 2006 08:36:12 GMT
 3754ms on RI versus 5740ms on Harmony to startup Tomcat.
 Seems about 50% slower as well.


On 11/1/06, Leo Li <liyilei1979@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  I have not got the precise number. I will try it.:)
>
> On 11/1/06, Mikhail Fursov <mike.fursov@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Good news! However I never believe in 100% :)
> >
> > You mentioned that startup with Harmony is slower then RI. I measured
> > Eclipse3.1.1 startup some time ago and DRLVM+classlib was ~50% slower (7
> > secs against 5 sec with SUN) then RI.
> > What are your numbers?
> >
> > On 11/1/06, Leo Li <liyilei1979@gmail.com > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi, all:
> > >       Harmony now has been able to pass 100% testcases on Tomcat5.5. I
> > ran
> > > them both on WindowsXP and Unbuntu, with J9 VM and drlvm.
> > >       The detailed information about how to build and run tests have
> > been
> > > put on http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Apache_Tomcat.
> > >
> > > Note:
> > >       1. Harmony launches slower than RI, so I add the interval
> > between
> > > the
> > > launch of Tomcat Server and  tests from 8 seconds to 30 seconds to
> > ensure
> > > the server has been running.
> > >       2. Runtime.exec fails on linux with J9 vm, as discussed on[1],
> > so I
> > > have altered the usage of fork to vfork as a workround despite of the
> > > possible side-effect of the latter.
> > > mailing thread
> > > [1]
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg16002.html
> >
> > > --
> > > Leo Li
> > > China Software Development Lab, IBM
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mikhail Fursov
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Leo Li
> China Software Development Lab, IBM
>



-- 
Leo Li
China Software Development Lab, IBM

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message