harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Vladimir Strigun" <vstri...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [performance] a few early benchmarks
Date Thu, 23 Nov 2006 09:51:57 GMT
On 23 Nov 2006 14:37:09 +0600, Egor Pasko <egor.pasko@gmail.com> wrote:
> On the 0x22A day of Apache Harmony Vladimir Strigun wrote:
> > The numbers that I published was received on P4 under Windows +
> > server.emconf +Harmony-1980. Unfortunately I haven't run Dacapo under
> > x86_64, but I hope we could receive almost the same range (10-20 %
> > slower that Sun) with the mentioned configuration.
>
> And Sun was running with "-server" too I guess? :)

Yes, of course.

> Maybe, it is time to track performance comparisons of *different
> platforms* in one place? That should help to avoid major differences in
> our visions for harmony performance.

Yes, good idea. Should we define the configuration for all VM's as well?
For instance, for Sun we could use parameters from spec site. What do
you think about it?

> * Melody
> * marmonytest.org
> * Robin's site
> * wiki (just for the start, maybe)
>
> > Thanks,
> > Vladimir.
> >
> > On 11/23/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
> > > I reviewed - looks like Robin is seeing DRLVM get an aggregate
> > > performance of about 35% of whatever he's measuring against.
> > >
> > > geir
> > >
> > >
> > > Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> > > >> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> > > >>>> Sergey Kuksenko wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> Lets do the simplest thing fist. :)
> > > >>>>> We can do it. We only need to specify a set of workloads.
> > > >>>> I've tried running dacapo with 10 warming stages and we are
constantly
> > > >>>> around 25% speed against the leading JVM (which is always
sun5 or
> > > >>>> sun6),
> > > >>>> bea5 is around 80% and ibm5 is around 70%, I'll have more
detailed
> > > >>>> results shortly.
> > > >>> I don't understand this at all.  It wasn't but a few weeks ago
when
> > > >>> someone was reporting decapo numbers that ranged from 90% of Sun5
to
> > > >>> 110% of Sun5.
> > > >>
> > > >> on x86_64?
> > > >
> > > > That's true.  It was x86.
> > > >
> > > > But the numbers that Robin is reporting aren't great either, are they?
> > > >
> > > > geir
> > > >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>
> --
> Egor Pasko
>
>

Mime
View raw message