harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Pavel Pervov" <pmcfi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r473588 - in /incubator/harmony/enhanced/drlvm/trunk/vm: interpreter/src/ port/src/lil/em64t/pim/ vmcore/include/ vmcore/src/util/em64t/base/
Date Sat, 11 Nov 2006 21:50:50 GMT
Geir,

Does SVN support some sort of exclude lists?


On 11/12/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Gregory Shimansky wrote:
> > On Saturday 11 November 2006 04:28 Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> >> gshimansky@apache.org wrote:
> >>> Author: gshimansky
> >>> Date: Fri Nov 10 16:17:50 2006
> >>> New Revision: 473588
> >>>
> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=473588
> >>> Log:
> >>> Applied HARMONY-2152 [drlvm][em64t] build is broken after 1558 have
> been
> >>> committed
> >>>
> >>> Since x86_64 is not yet fully supported and patch touched only x86_64
> >>> files no tests were ran. When I tried acceptance tests on em64t server
> I
> >>> effectively shut it down.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Modified:
> >>>
> incubator/harmony/enhanced/drlvm/trunk/vm/vmcore/include/version_svn_tag.
> >>> h URL:
> >>>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/harmony/enhanced/drlvm/trunk/vm/vm
> >>>
> core/include/version_svn_tag.h?view=diff&rev=473588&r1=473587&r2=473588
> >>>
> =========================================================================
> >>> ===== ---
> >>>
> incubator/harmony/enhanced/drlvm/trunk/vm/vmcore/include/version_svn_tag.
> >>> h (original) +++
> >>>
> incubator/harmony/enhanced/drlvm/trunk/vm/vmcore/include/version_svn_tag.
> >>> h Fri Nov 10 16:17:50 2006 @@ -18,6 +18,6 @@
> >>>  #ifndef _VERSION_SVN_TAG_
> >>>  #define _VERSION_SVN_TAG_
> >>>
> >>> -#define VERSION_SVN_TAG  "473506"
> >>> +#define VERSION_SVN_TAG  "svn: This client is too old to work with
> >>> working copy '.'; please get a newer Subversion client"
> >> uh?
> >
> > Ok it seems like svn version on the x86_64 server was too old for the
> checked
> > out repository. Don't worry, the version file will be fixed with a next
> > commit to VM.
> >
> > It looks like we should really autogenerate it and remove it from svn as
> was
> > suggested in another thread.
> >
>
> It is autogenerated.  We just need to stop committing it...
>
> geir
>
>


-- 
Pavel Pervov,
Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message