harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Pavel Pervov" <pmcfi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [drlvm][jit] Moving jet to the top level of drlvm...
Date Fri, 03 Nov 2006 14:50:07 GMT
It was Class.h actually... :)

I'm afraid if I do that, those supporting JITs will come after me, and I
won't write any more to this list.

P.S. It might be not that bad from someones POV, but I would prefer staying
alive...

On 11/3/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Pavel Pervov wrote:
> > Hello, community,
> >
> > Working through DRLVM sources I (once again) looked at organization of
> > jitrino code.
> >
> > Actually, there are two JITs hidden inside "jitrino": JET and OPT.
> >
> > As far as I may observe - these two are code-independent from each
> other.
> >
> > JIT-guys, could you comment?
> >
> > If I'm right here I would vote for moving them to top level of
> > drlvm/trunk/vm directory to clearly indicate we have two JITs in DRLVM.
> >
>
> That's cool, and helps show that the jit is pluggable.  But lets not go
> through the same saga as the jni.h cleanup :)
>
> before you submit a big patch, lets sketch it out, and maybe it's
> something someone can "just do".
>
> geir
>
>


-- 
Pavel Pervov,
Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message