Weldon,
Basically, yes. Algorithms were indeed changed, where interfaces dictated
so. Also, several places were optimized out as dead code.
Pavel.
On 11/3/06, Weldon Washburn <weldonwjw@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Pavel,
>
> I just now looked at your latest H1558 patch. Unfortunately the patch
> won't
> cleanly apply. It can not be committed yet. In any case, 1558 seems to
> basically reformat the interfaces that access class specific info. It
> looks
> like a bunch of cosmetic changes. No change in underlying algorithms. Is
> this correct?
>
> Aleksey, Pavel,
>
> Do you know if there are interdependencies between H1558 and H2000? In
> any
> case, I believe H1558 should be committed first. And H2000 will have to
> pick up the pieces.
>
> Everyone,
>
> Comments? Suggestions?
>
> --
> Weldon Washburn
> Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
>
>
--
Pavel Pervov,
Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
|