harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexey Petrenko" <alexey.a.petre...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [performance] a few early benchmarks
Date Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:54:25 GMT
2006/11/24, Alexey Varlamov <alexey.v.varlamov@gmail.com>:
> 2006/11/24, Alexey Petrenko <alexey.a.petrenko@gmail.com>:
> > 23 Nov 2006 19:44:23 +0600, Egor Pasko <egor.pasko@gmail.com>:
> > > On the 0x22A day of Apache Harmony Alexey Petrenko wrote:
> > > > 2006/11/23, Mikhail Loenko <mloenko@gmail.com>:
> > > > > 23 Nov 2006 16:34:22 +0600, Egor Pasko <egor.pasko@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > On the 0x22A day of Apache Harmony Alexey Petrenko wrote:
> > > > > > > 2006/11/23, Vladimir Strigun <vstrigun@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > On 23 Nov 2006 14:37:09 +0600, Egor Pasko <egor.pasko@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On the 0x22A day of Apache Harmony Vladimir Strigun
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > The numbers that I published was received
on P4 under Windows +
> > > > > > > > > > server.emconf +Harmony-1980. Unfortunately
I haven't run Dacapo under
> > > > > > > > > > x86_64, but I hope we could receive almost
the same range (10-20 %
> > > > > > > > > > slower that Sun) with the mentioned configuration.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > And Sun was running with "-server" too I guess?
:)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Yes, of course.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Maybe, it is time to track performance comparisons
of *different
> > > > > > > > > platforms* in one place? That should help to
avoid major differences in
> > > > > > > > > our visions for harmony performance.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Yes, good idea. Should we define the configuration
for all VM's as well?
> > > > > > > > For instance, for Sun we could use parameters from
spec site. What do
> > > > > > > > you think about it?
> > > > > > > +1 for options from spec site.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am in love with it too. We could present results similar to
how
> > > > > > spec.org does. Just a list of runs.
> > > > > > For each:
> > > > > > * revision number
> > > > > > * hardware/os summary (number of cores)
> > > > > > * link to full details
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > > * more?
> > > > >
> > > > > score? :)
> > >
> > > oops :)
> > >
> > > > Scores are most visible things but we can not easily publish them for
> > > > all specs...
> > > not allowed -> won't publish. We have great free benchmarks (thanks to
> > > DaCapo guys!), they will give us a good picture.
> > But I think that we should keep these (spec) benchmarks in mind and
> > optimize Harmony for them.
> For the *default* mode?
No. For server mode.

SY, Alexey

Mime
View raw message