harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexey Petrenko" <alexey.a.petre...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [heads up] the importance of 'reversed' API completion
Date Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:17:41 GMT
2006/11/20, Paulex Yang <paulex.yang@gmail.com>:
> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> > As shown in the graphical history of harmony at
> >
> >  http://67.86.14.213:10000/harmony.png
> >
> > we are currently at 96.39% of API completion (if we don't count the
> > SerialID differences and the final static values), and we are
> > continuously growing there.
> >
> > But there is also another index, the "reversed" API completion that
> > measures how much code the RI didn't implement that we did.
> >
> > Here, a 100% means that all that code that we have implemented in those
> > public packages is available in the RI.
> >
> > In order to achieve WORA, the TCK mandates that both direct and reverse
> > completion be 100%.
> >
> > I suggest we start to pay attention to both.
> >
> I'd like to look at LUNI modules, but seems the most significant issues
> are ORB stuffs, anyone knows why so many additional packages/classes there?
It was discussed while Yoko integration to Harmony...
The main cause is that Yoko is CORBA 2.4 while RI implements CORBA 2.3...

SY, Alexey

Mime
View raw message