# harmony-dev mailing list archives

##### Site index · List index
Message view
Top
Subject Re: [general][testing] cruise control on the WinXP and SUSE linux
Date Fri, 17 Nov 2006 09:17:20 GMT
```For the first notification: sometimes it happens :( Usually, the second run
helps.
For the second, I need more information. I never saw it before.

Could you rerun it?

On 11/16/06, Stepan Mishura <stepan.mishura@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> I've applied the latest patch from HARMONY-995 and run CC. And it failed
> on
> Windows. However I've just built and run classlib's tests successfully.
> I've
>
> The first one is 724Kb and starts with:
>
> BUILD FAILED
> Ant Error Message:
> C:\users\smishura\buildtest\cc\projects\classlib\trunk\build.xml:123: The
> following error occurred while executing this line:
> C:\users\smishura\buildtest\cc\projects\classlib\trunk\make\build-java.xml
> :96:
> ... Built files still exist after module clean targets have run. This
> probably means that one or more patternsets are incomplete. The remaining
> files are:
>
> C:\users\smishura\buildtest\cc\projects\classlib\trunk\build\classes\com\sun\net\ssl\internal\ssl\Provider\$1.class
>
> C:\users\smishura\buildtest\cc\projects\classlib\trunk\build\classes\com\sun\net\ssl\internal\ssl\Provider.class
> ..
> ... <list of Classlib classes>
>
> The second notification is small and it just says:
> BUILD FAILED
> Ant Error Message: error string found
>
> Any idea what is wrong?
>
> Thanks,
> Stepan.
>
> On 11/16/06, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
> >
> > On 11/16/06, Stepan Mishura  wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Sorry, I didn't follow discussions about build-and-test infra. I've
> done
> > > check out of build-and-test workspace and I'm trying to set up it. I
> > > have some questions:
> CC
> > on
> > > DRL VM. Does the file is up to date?
> > > - 'ant setup' fetches CruiseControl and sets it up. But why I should
> > fetch
> > > classlib dependencies manually? IMHO, 'ant setup' should do it too.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks. You're the second person who asks about CC :)
> >
> > Actually, I use the updated version of script (this one + patch from
> issue
> > 995). The updated version has updated README.txt and also run build for
> > classlib and drlvm modules. Please, try it.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Stepan.
> > >
> > > On 11/16/06, Vladimir Ivanov  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thanks, today this test passed on both machines :( I hope, the CC
> will
> > > > send
> > > > notification if this test fail again.
> > > >
> > > > Now, notifications should be sending to harmony-commits list from
> the
> > > > nomail@intel.com address.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks, Vladimir
> > > >
> > > > On 11/16/06, Stepan Mishura wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On 11/15/06, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sorry, I can't use the harmony-commits@incubator.apache.org
mail
> > > > > address.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sorry again, to test it I use the nomail@hursley.ibm.com as
for
> > IBM
> > > > > > notifications without ask for permission :(
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Could somebody register some fake mail address in the
> > > harmony-commits
> > > > to
> > > > > > use
> > > > > > it for my CC notifications or I should use other alias or may
be
> > > other
> > > > > > options exist?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks, Vladimir
> > > > > >
> > > > > > By the way, now my CC reports for both systems:
> > > > > > Unit Test Error Details: (1)    Test:  test_Sign Class:
> > > > > > org.apache.harmony.xnet.tests.provider.jsse.DigitalSignatureTest
> > > > > > junit.framework.AssertionFailedError   at
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.harmony.xnet.tests.provider.jsse.DigitalSignatureTest.test_Sign
> > > > > > (
> > > > > > DigitalSignatureTest.java:135)   at
> > > > > > java.lang.reflect.VMReflection.invokeMethod(Native Method)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hm, ... strange. The test passes for me on Linux and Windows.
> > > > >
> > > > > This is regression test for JSSE provider and it goes with a fix
> for
> > > the
> > > > > provider. So it can fail if CC doesn't perform classlib rebuild.
> And
> > I
> > > > > believe it does.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is the failure stable for you? Can you reproduce it?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Stepan.
> > > > >
> > > > > On 11/15/06, Alexey Varlamov <alexey.v.varlamov@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 15.11.06, Gregory Shimansky<gshimansky@gmail.com>
написал(а):
> > > > > > > > Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Hello everyone,
> > > > > > > > > I started cruise control (stored in the "buildtest"
module
> > > with
> > > > > > patch
> > > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > > issue 995) on the Windows XP and SUSE Linux boxes.
> > > > > > > > > Both machines are identical (1 CPU - P4*3GHz,
1GB RAM,
> 120Gb
> > > > HDD).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On each platform cruise control runs (as separate
projects
> > in
> > > СС
> > > > > > > terms, all
> > > > > > > > > settings have default values):
> > > > > > > > > - build of classlib module (target: 'rebuild');
> > > > > > > > > - classlib tests on J9 VM (target 'test' in the
classlib
> > > > module);
> > > > > > > > > - build of drlvm module (target: 'build');
> > > > > > > > > - vm tests (kernel+smoke+cunit, target: 'test'
in the
> drlvm
> > > > > module);
> > > > > > > > > - classlib tests on DRL VM (target: 'test' in
the classlib
> > > > module
> > > > > > with
> > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > > Dtest.jre.home=drlvm);
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Is it OK to send my cruise control notifications
to the
> > > > > > > harmony-commits
> > > > > > > > > list
> > > > > > > > > in order to notify about regressions?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I suspect the notifications are not ideal but
I will work
> on
> > > > their
> > > > > > > > > improvement upon precedents (false alarms) and
your
> feedback
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I am +1 for cruise control and notifications to
> > harmony-commit.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > But I wonder about linux version choice. If it is
SuSE9,
> then
> > > > could
> > > > > we
> > > > > > > > upgrade it to SuSE10 or install another distribution
like
> FC5
> > > with
> > > > > gcc
> > > > > > > > 4.1.x? This will help a lot with compilation errors
which
> gcc
> > > > 3.3.3on
> > > > > > > > SuSE9 doesn't report.
> > > > > > > Good point, I support this.
> > > > > > > Alexey
> > >
> >
>
> --
> Stepan Mishura
> Intel Middleware Products Division
> ------------------------------------------------------