harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Aleksey Ignatenko" <aleksey.ignate...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [drlvm] Is it time to say goodbye to dear friend GC v4?
Date Fri, 03 Nov 2006 09:49:19 GMT
GCv4 is an "old friend" actually :), dropping it from the main trunk will
precisely "kill" it . Actually, I would say that it is usefull to have
working GCv4 at least untill we are done with class unloading.
So my
-1 for a quarter.


On 11/3/06, Ivan Volosyuk <ivan.volosyuk@gmail.com> wrote:
> I would like to know the opinion of Artem, Salikh and Alexey
> Ignatenko. They have used the GC and may have reasons to keep it.
> As for me, I occasionally use it (GCv4) and a modified version of
> GCv4.1 (which can help detect heap access via lost pointers). Most of
> the time I prefer second one, but sometimes it is helpful to run with
> completely different code base. I didn't try GCv5 yet. If it stable I
> will switch to it.
> --
> Ivan
> On 11/2/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
> > Is there any reason to keep this around in the main branch?

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message