harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Morozova, Nadezhda" <nadezhda.moroz...@intel.com>
Subject RE: Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-2009) Brush up and update Eclipse-related docs, make them user-friendly.
Date Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:56:50 GMT
>> >would be a good idea to remove the DRLVM section from that page.  I
>> think
>> >we
>> >had discussed this before in a previous thread.  What do you think?
>> >
>> [Nadya] well, I think if we neglect eclipse+drlvm at all, nobody
would
>> ever try it. I suggest that we keep the distribution of general vs.
>> classlib specific, and hold a placeholder for drlvm... and hope :)
>
>IMHO, a placeholder is not necessary
So you don't believe we shall have such a page one day? :) 

Cheers, 
Nadya
 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: news [mailto:news@sea.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Egor Pasko
>Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 2:50 PM
>To: dev@harmony.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-2009) Brush up and update
Eclipse-
>related docs, make them user-friendly.
>
>On the 0x230 day of Apache Harmony Nadezhda Morozova wrote:
>> Sian,
>> Thanks for a prompt reply. See answers below.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Nadya
>>
>>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: Sian January [mailto:sianjanuary@googlemail.com]
>> >Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 1:51 PM
>> >To: dev@harmony.apache.org
>> >Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-2009) Brush up and update
>> Eclipse-
>> >related docs, make them user-friendly.
>> >
>> >Hi Nadya,
>> >
>> >I'm replying to your comments on the dev list rather than in the
JIRA
>> >itself
>> >(HARMONY-2009) as this seemed like a discussion.  I have written
>> >some responses inline, but I just wondered whether since there was
no
>> >response to the "Anybody tried DRLVM+Eclipse and can share?" thread
if
>> it
>> >would be a good idea to remove the DRLVM section from that page.  I
>> think
>> >we
>> >had discussed this before in a previous thread.  What do you think?
>> >
>> [Nadya] well, I think if we neglect eclipse+drlvm at all, nobody
would
>> ever try it. I suggest that we keep the distribution of general vs.
>> classlib specific, and hold a placeholder for drlvm... and hope :)
>
>IMHO, a placeholder is not necessary
>
>> >Thanks,
>> >
>> >Sian
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >On 28/11/06, Nadya Morozova (JIRA) <jira@apache.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>    [
>> >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-
>> >2009?page=comments#action_12454039]
>> >>
>> >> Nadya Morozova commented on HARMONY-2009:
>> >> -----------------------------------------
>> >>
>> >> some review comments. please don't take too seriously -
negotiations
>> >> welcome.
>> >>
>> >> - Introduction: 1st sentence is about harmony, 2nd - about
classlib
>> only.
>> >> what about drlvm? an intro to the kind of info on drlvm
development
>> tips
>> >> would be great.
>> >
>> >
>> >I'm not sure how useful the DRLVM information is here (see above
>> comments),
>> >but if we do decide to keep it I agree that we should include an
>> >introductory paragraph.
>> [Nadya] ok, let's ask somebody else about it and see what they say.
>> >
>> >
>> >- Prerequisites: (just curious) can there be people trying to work
in
>> >> eclipse but using something different from subclipse for svn
>> >transactions?
>> >
>> >
>> >Yes - there's another Eclipse plug-in called Subversive although I'm
>> not
>> >sure if anyone in the Harmony community has tried it.
>> [Nadya] do you think we can change the text a bit to make a general
>> statement and then a specific tool tip, like:
>> "check out the source using the URL. If you're using subclipse, do
blah
>> - blah"
>> >
>> >- Prerequisites: you require a classlib build, though the page is
>> supposed
>> >> to be for classlib+drlvm
>> >> - spelling: is it "pre-requisites" or "prerequisites"? check
>> >> merriam-webster, they suggest one word.
>> >
>> >
>> >Let's use "prerequisites" if that's the one in the dictionary
>> [Nadya] ok
>> >
>> >- Configuring Eclipse: are all steps in this section
classlib-specific?
>> >
>> >
>> >Yes
>> [Nadya] was just checking :)
>> >
>> >- Configuring Eclipse: some steps seemt to assume that the reader is
>> using
>> >> Windows? can we make the text OS neutral and separate OS
specifics?
>> >
>> >
>> >Yes - it would be good to make it clear that some of the steps are
>> specific
>> >to Windows.
>> [Nadya] do you think you can write an update? I'm not a Linux user,
so
>> it's rather difficult for me to write an update.
>> >
>> >- Configuring Eclipse: please double-check formatting; sometimes, UI
>> >> elements are in bold, at other times - monospace font; some UI
>> elements
>> >are
>> >> in quotes, others not. sticking to one notation could help. bold
with
>> no
>> >> quotes seems to be shorter and easy to decipher, but i don't
insist
>> :)
>> >
>> >
>> >I agree
>> >
>> >- Configuring Eclipse: do you think we can separate Configuring
Eclipse
>> >> proper and, say, getting the source code (set up svn, check out,
>> etc)? in
>> >> the current list, steps 5-6 might as well be step 1 - right? can
we
>> have
>> >two
>> >> grouping? also, the info about checkout is exactly the same for
drlvm
>> and
>> >> classlib except for slight differences in the path. perhaps, we
can
>> have
>> >a
>> >> section on Check Out Source Code. there, we could explain how to
>> check
>> >out
>> >> using eclipse-related means and provide a link to some other
webpage
>> >> explaining other ways of check out and related problems (say,
working
>> >behind
>> >> a firewall).
>> >
>> >
>> >I think I would have to see what that looked like before commenting.
>> It
>> >does seem to make sense, but I'm not sure if it would be confusing
to
>> have
>> >so many sections in the page.
>> [Nadya] ok, we can have two versions and then compare.
>> >
>> >thanks, Nadya
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > Brush up and update Eclipse-related docs, make them
user-friendly.
>> >> >
------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >
>> >> >                 Key: HARMONY-2009
>> >> >                 URL:
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2009
>> >> >             Project: Harmony
>> >> >          Issue Type: Improvement
>> >> >          Components: Website/Documentation
>> >> >            Reporter: Svetlana Konovalova
>> >> >         Assigned To: Nadya Morozova
>> >> >         Attachments: dev_eclipse.patch, dev_eclipse_patch.txt,
>> >> get-involved_patch.txt, H2009-deveclipse.patch
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > The documentation doesn't cover all aspects of work with
Eclipse.
>> Need
>> >> to brush up and update Eclipse-related docs, make them
user-friendly.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>> >> -
>> >> If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the
>> administrators:
>> >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
>> >> -
>> >> For more information on JIRA, see:
>> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >Sian January
>> >
>> >IBM Java Technology Centre, UK
>>
>
>--
>Egor Pasko

Mime
View raw message