harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Weldon Washburn" <weldon...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [drlvm][sablevm] Desing of Class Unloading Support
Date Thu, 09 Nov 2006 06:56:32 GMT
On 11/8/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Weldon Washburn wrote:
> > On 11/7/06, Ivan Volosyuk <ivan.volosyuk@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 07 Nov 2006 14:35:55 +0600, Egor Pasko <egor.pasko@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > I already have one idea how to benefit from movable vtables.
> >
> >
> > There would have to be a very compelling argument for making vtables
> > movable.  Like a business workload that Harmony needs to run within the
> > next
> > 12 months.
>
> How would a business workload need this directly?


That's the point.  I can't figure out any compelling story for moving
vtables.  As far as I can tell, its over-engineering.   I would love to be
proven wrong.

geir
>
>


-- 
Weldon Washburn
Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message