harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paulex Yang <paulex.y...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [general] longer term roadmap
Date Mon, 27 Nov 2006 14:30:13 GMT
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>
>
> Paulex Yang wrote:
>> Mikhail Loenko wrote:
>>> I'm ok with that timeline. We probably need goals for "dotted"
>>> releases also (like 5.1 where we can improve for example performance)
>> I'm not sure, but I thought we can only release 5.0_01 if Sun didn't 
>> have 5.1?
>
> Why not?
>
> There is a version of the spec, and a version of the implementation, 
> which are different.
If so, I prefer to Harmony 1.0(SE 5.0 compatible), 1.1(SE 5.0 compatible 
with performance enhancement) just like what Geronmo does, rather than 
5.0, 5.1, which is confusing.
>
> geir
>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Mikhail
>>>
>>> 2006/11/27, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com>:
>>>> I noticed that I've said the following several times, and it's really
>>>> not for me to say, but for us to say.
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone have a problem with the following "high-level" time line?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Mid 2007 : Java SE 5
>>>>
>>>> End 2007 : Java SE 6 (meaning we have to start thinking about Java 
>>>> SE 6
>>>> classlib changes...)
>>>>
>>>> End 2008 : Java SE 7 (this really means "we'll do Java SE 7 when Sun
>>>> does Java SE 7...")
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> geir
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
Paulex Yang
China Software Development Lab
IBM



Mime
View raw message