harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <g...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: [performance] a few early benchmarks
Date Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:34:17 GMT
We also need to track *precisely* what is being tested.

SVN rev #, any patches, configuration (params) and of course, 
platform/OS run on.

geir


Egor Pasko wrote:
> On the 0x22A day of Apache Harmony Vladimir Strigun wrote:
>> The numbers that I published was received on P4 under Windows +
>> server.emconf +Harmony-1980. Unfortunately I haven't run Dacapo under
>> x86_64, but I hope we could receive almost the same range (10-20 %
>> slower that Sun) with the mentioned configuration.
> 
> And Sun was running with "-server" too I guess? :)
> Maybe, it is time to track performance comparisons of *different
> platforms* in one place? That should help to avoid major differences in
> our visions for harmony performance.
> 
> * Melody
> * marmonytest.org
> * Robin's site
> * wiki (just for the start, maybe)
> 
>> Thanks,
>> Vladimir.
>>
>> On 11/23/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
>>> I reviewed - looks like Robin is seeing DRLVM get an aggregate
>>> performance of about 35% of whatever he's measuring against.
>>>
>>> geir
>>>
>>>
>>> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>>>>> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>>>>> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>>>>>>> Sergey Kuksenko wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Lets do the simplest thing fist. :)
>>>>>>>> We can do it. We only need to specify a set of workloads.
>>>>>>> I've tried running dacapo with 10 warming stages and we are constantly
>>>>>>> around 25% speed against the leading JVM (which is always sun5
or
>>>>>>> sun6),
>>>>>>> bea5 is around 80% and ibm5 is around 70%, I'll have more detailed
>>>>>>> results shortly.
>>>>>> I don't understand this at all.  It wasn't but a few weeks ago when
>>>>>> someone was reporting decapo numbers that ranged from 90% of Sun5
to
>>>>>> 110% of Sun5.
>>>>> on x86_64?
>>>> That's true.  It was x86.
>>>>
>>>> But the numbers that Robin is reporting aren't great either, are they?
>>>>
>>>> geir
>>>>
> 

Mime
View raw message