harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <g...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: [general][testing] cruise control on the WinXP and SUSE linux
Date Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:45:33 GMT


Stepan Mishura wrote:
> Vladimir,
> 
> Sorry, I didn't follow discussions about build-and-test infra. I've done
> check out of build-and-test workspace and I'm trying to set up it. I
> have some questions:
> - README.txt file says about downloading IBM VME and I guess you run CC on
> DRL VM. Does the file is up to date?

No - that was written before DRLVM could do this :)

> - 'ant setup' fetches CruiseControl and sets it up. But why I should fetch
> classlib dependencies manually? IMHO, 'ant setup' should do it too.

Again, early days... the patches should fix...

> 
> Thanks,
> Stepan.
> 
> On 11/16/06, Vladimir Ivanov  wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, today this test passed on both machines :( I hope, the CC will
>> send
>> notification if this test fail again.
>>
>> Now, notifications should be sending to harmony-commits list from the
>> nomail@intel.com address.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks, Vladimir
>>
>> On 11/16/06, Stepan Mishura wrote:
>>
>> > On 11/15/06, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Sorry, I can't use the harmony-commits@incubator.apache.org mail
>> > address.
>> > >
>> > > Sorry again, to test it I use the nomail@hursley.ibm.com as for IBM
>> > > notifications without ask for permission :(
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Could somebody register some fake mail address in the harmony-commits
>> to
>> > > use
>> > > it for my CC notifications or I should use other alias or may be 
>> other
>> > > options exist?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Thanks, Vladimir
>> > >
>> > > By the way, now my CC reports for both systems:
>> > > Unit Test Error Details: (1)    Test:  test_Sign Class:
>> > > org.apache.harmony.xnet.tests.provider.jsse.DigitalSignatureTest
>> > > junit.framework.AssertionFailedError   at
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.harmony.xnet.tests.provider.jsse.DigitalSignatureTest.test_Sign 
>>
>> > > (
>> > > DigitalSignatureTest.java:135)   at
>> > > java.lang.reflect.VMReflection.invokeMethod(Native Method)
>> >
>> >
>> > Hm, ... strange. The test passes for me on Linux and Windows.
>> >
>> > This is regression test for JSSE provider and it goes with a fix for 
>> the
>> > provider. So it can fail if CC doesn't perform classlib rebuild. And I
>> > believe it does.
>> >
>> > Is the failure stable for you? Can you reproduce it?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Stepan.
>> >
>> > On 11/15/06, Alexey Varlamov <alexey.v.varlamov@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > 15.11.06, Gregory Shimansky<gshimansky@gmail.com> написал(а):
>> > > > > Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
>> > > > > > Hello everyone,
>> > > > > > I started cruise control (stored in the "buildtest" module
with
>> > > patch
>> > > > from
>> > > > > > issue 995) on the Windows XP and SUSE Linux boxes.
>> > > > > > Both machines are identical (1 CPU - P4*3GHz, 1GB RAM, 120Gb
>> HDD).
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On each platform cruise control runs (as separate projects

>> in СС
>> > > > terms, all
>> > > > > > settings have default values):
>> > > > > > - build of classlib module (target: 'rebuild');
>> > > > > > - classlib tests on J9 VM (target 'test' in the classlib
>> module);
>> > > > > > - build of drlvm module (target: 'build');
>> > > > > > - vm tests (kernel+smoke+cunit, target: 'test' in the drlvm
>> > module);
>> > > > > > - classlib tests on DRL VM (target: 'test' in the classlib
>> module
>> > > with
>> > > > -
>> > > > > > Dtest.jre.home=drlvm);
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Is it OK to send my cruise control notifications to the
>> > > > harmony-commits
>> > > > > > list
>> > > > > > in order to notify about regressions?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I suspect the notifications are not ideal but I will work
on
>> their
>> > > > > > improvement upon precedents (false alarms) and your feedback
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I am +1 for cruise control and notifications to harmony-commit.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > But I wonder about linux version choice. If it is SuSE9, then
>> could
>> > we
>> > > > > upgrade it to SuSE10 or install another distribution like FC5

>> with
>> > gcc
>> > > > > 4.1.x? This will help a lot with compilation errors which gcc
>> 3.3.3on
>> > > > > SuSE9 doesn't report.
>> > > > Good point, I support this.
>> > > > Alexey
>> >
>>
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message