harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefano Mazzocchi <stef...@apache.org>
Subject Re: svn commit: r473588 - in /incubator/harmony/enhanced/drlvm/trunk/vm: interpreter/src/ port/src/lil/em64t/pim/ vmcore/include/ vmcore/src/util/em64t/base/
Date Sat, 11 Nov 2006 21:55:54 GMT
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> 
> 
> Gregory Shimansky wrote:
>> On Saturday 11 November 2006 04:28 Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>>> gshimansky@apache.org wrote:
>>>> Author: gshimansky
>>>> Date: Fri Nov 10 16:17:50 2006
>>>> New Revision: 473588
>>>>
>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=473588
>>>> Log:
>>>> Applied HARMONY-2152 [drlvm][em64t] build is broken after 1558 have
>>>> been
>>>> committed
>>>>
>>>> Since x86_64 is not yet fully supported and patch touched only x86_64
>>>> files no tests were ran. When I tried acceptance tests on em64t
>>>> server I
>>>> effectively shut it down.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Modified:
>>>> incubator/harmony/enhanced/drlvm/trunk/vm/vmcore/include/version_svn_tag.
>>>>
>>>> h URL:
>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/harmony/enhanced/drlvm/trunk/vm/vm
>>>>
>>>> core/include/version_svn_tag.h?view=diff&rev=473588&r1=473587&r2=473588
>>>> =========================================================================
>>>>
>>>> ===== ---
>>>> incubator/harmony/enhanced/drlvm/trunk/vm/vmcore/include/version_svn_tag.
>>>>
>>>> h (original) +++
>>>> incubator/harmony/enhanced/drlvm/trunk/vm/vmcore/include/version_svn_tag.
>>>>
>>>> h Fri Nov 10 16:17:50 2006 @@ -18,6 +18,6 @@
>>>>  #ifndef _VERSION_SVN_TAG_
>>>>  #define _VERSION_SVN_TAG_
>>>>
>>>> -#define VERSION_SVN_TAG  "473506"
>>>> +#define VERSION_SVN_TAG  "svn: This client is too old to work with
>>>> working copy '.'; please get a newer Subversion client"
>>> uh?
>>
>> Ok it seems like svn version on the x86_64 server was too old for the
>> checked out repository. Don't worry, the version file will be fixed
>> with a next commit to VM.
>>
>> It looks like we should really autogenerate it and remove it from svn
>> as was suggested in another thread.
>>
> 
> It is autogenerated.  We just need to stop committing it...

ehm, how about using svn:ignore then ;-)

-- 
Stefano.


Mime
View raw message