Alexey Varlamov wrote:
> Sorry if it was already discussed, but I believe this approach also
> requires marking vtable bit/byte on each object allocation, unitl the
> "unloading" GC pass is strictly stop-the-world full-heap collection.
> Robin, did you include this particular overhead too in your
> measurements?
My proposal already argued that vtable bit/byte/word marking is
unnecessary for "nursery allocations". You only need to mark the vtable
of objects that survive collection and pretenured objects.
Etienne
--
Etienne M. Gagnon, Ph.D. http://www.info2.uqam.ca/~egagnon/
SableVM: http://www.sablevm.org/
SableCC: http://www.sablecc.org/
|