harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Spark Shen <smallsmallor...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Behaving differently than RI
Date Mon, 06 Nov 2006 08:55:54 GMT
Alexey Petrenko 写道:
> 2006/11/6, Spark Shen <smallsmallorgan@gmail.com>:
>> Alexey Petrenko 写道:
>> > Hi, Mike.
>> >
>> > You can find compatybility guideline for Harmony here:
>> > 
>> http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/subcomponents/classlibrary/compat.html 
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > According to your testcase. I think it is a bug and you should file it
>> > to JIRA.
>> AFAIK, ICU has its own mailing list[1]. If that incompatibility is
>> considered a bug, delegate to ICU development team may be more 
>> efficient.
> Right.
> But even if it is an ICU bug I think that it will be good to have also
> Harmony JIRA entry with the link to corresponding ICU issue.
Agree with you to report a JIRA to record this issue.
>
> SY, Alexey
>
>> [1] "ICU support mailing list" <icu-support@lists.sourceforge.net>
>
>> > 2006/11/4, Mike Ringrose <mike.ringrose@gmail.com>:
>> >> Before submitting a bug to JIRA, I was curious to know, how exact 
>> should
>> >> Harmony behave when compared to the RI. For example, the code below
>> >> produces
>> >> different results when compared to the RI.
>> >>
>> >>    DecimalFormat f = new DecimalFormat(".1");
>> >>    System.out.println(f.format(17.16));
>> >>
>> >> Harmony outputs 17.2, while the RI outputs 17.1. The reason for the
>> >> difference is that Harmony's underlying implementation is taken 
>> from ICU
>> >> which supports options other than what is specified by the RI.
>> >>
>> >> Should this difference be considered a bug?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Mike Ringrose
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Spark Shen
>> China Software Development Lab, IBM
>>
>>


-- 
Spark Shen
China Software Development Lab, IBM


Mime
View raw message