harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Nathan Beyer" <nbe...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Japi diffs for harmony
Date Thu, 09 Nov 2006 02:48:53 GMT
No problem on the name change, but doesn't what Stuart is talking
about require that methods add this exception to the signature to
actually show up in the reports?

On 11/8/06, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:
> Stuart Ballard wrote:
> > Tim Ellison wrote:
> >> I'm no fan of stubs for just such reason.  But for those dev's that are
> >> following along, there is an
> >> org.apache.harmony.luni.util.NotYetImplementedException that is defined
> >> for just such purposes.
> >
> > Would you consider renaming this to NotImplementedException since Japi
> > recognizes that name in throws clauses and treats it specially?
> >
> > If you feel strongly about not changing the existing name, I can add
> > NotYetImplementedException as an alternative hardcoded name in
> > Japitools but that seems kinda redundant...
> >
> > What do you think?
>
> I have no objection to renaming it.  If nobody objects in the next day
> or so then I'll go ahead and do it.
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
> --
>
> Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com)
> IBM Java technology centre, UK.
>

Mime
View raw message