Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of evgueni.brevnov@gmail.com
 designates 66.249.92.175 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=dHXctPt0C+24vlbu+sYMbcR54frBZhIMG5aTUJ8dgm8qadOKDaczYLlAp0gv5z5Q6JODmaktxKgcEHeXxv02gmCDwwuUN+XTk8bkG8ybapzVSNrz81KmXWDrFEAjybobJSJwSpMJO/097OaH7KpeS3+DGTlxH8FUaWsg5HrzKKE=
Message-ID: <e29119980610260141o7883ebbw1606a8737b67ba53@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 15:41:26 +0700
From: "Evgueni Brevnov" <evgueni.brevnov@gmail.com>
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [drlvm][test]Exclude some tests from "build test" target,
 make 'build test' pass
In-Reply-To: <2A786EB15713B544AB79607529273B04062C33@mssmsx411>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <2A786EB15713B544AB79607529273B04062C33@mssmsx411>

BTW, gc.LOS started to fail for me on SUSE9. Anybody observes the
same? Here is the log:

FAILED, Amount of free memory increases
FAILED, Amount of free memory increases
PASSED

Evgueni

On 10/26/06, Volynets, Vera <vera.volynets@intel.com> wrote:
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pavel Ozhdikhin [mailto:pavel.ozhdikhin@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 10:18 AM
> To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [drlvm][test]Exclude some tests from "build test" target,
> make 'build test' pass
>
> On 10/26/06, Gregory Shimansky <gshimansky@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wednesday 25 October 2006 21:05 Rana Dasgupta wrote:
> > > The ideal way would be for acceptance tests like "build test" to
> always
> > > pass and to catch and roll back the patch that breaks this
> invariant,
> > > rather than to disable the tests. But I agree with Vera, it is
> important
> > to
> > > keep a running set up as acceptance tests, so disabling the well
> known
> > > failures may be the only way until we fix the problems.
> > >
> > > I don't know that any of the tests are "unstable". These are
> > implementation
> > > bugs. gc.LOS is a bug in thread yielding by the apr Windows
> > functionality.
> > > The java.lang.ObjectTest also looks like an interpreter
> implementation
> > > error.
> >
> > I wonder about gc.LOS, I remember there was a discussion, and I think
> > there
> > were patches too. But I cannot find any right now. Were there any
> fixes to
> > the problem which made gc.LOS to work on WinXP?
>
>
> This is Harmony-1933
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1933> issue
> and it still lacks a patch.
>
> Thanks,
> Pavel
>
> Hmm and java.lang.ObjectTest works for me both on windows and linux...
> >
> > --
> > Gregory Shimansky, Intel Middleware Products Division
> >
>
> Pavel, test java.lang.ObjectTest fails very seldom. I checked it on Win
> XP, ia32, interpreter, release configuration. It didn't fail yesterday
> 25 October, but it failed 24 October (vm revision: 467401 classlib
> revision: 467390) and about a week ago, so it's unstable.
>