Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 40233 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2006 12:56:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Oct 2006 12:56:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 69349 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2006 12:56:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 69049 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2006 12:56:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 69038 invoked by uid 99); 16 Oct 2006 12:56:06 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 05:56:06 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of mike.fursov@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.169] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 05:56:05 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id y2so975946uge for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 05:55:45 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=FhLUNCpLhjDtvuEN30ZAFwtKxg+G6CgxgrScfoUIupi5fivyrnhfZY8lj8xGxdMgjNbYDp/fttNzwC3oE6rPI5WtS77+aSnCRHZniaRwCMd216PcSky3YgtP7IhSFix6DgLw94/yK9HuJ1gs0RaDLq/v0AoHwEwuE0DhYvqf7zQ= Received: by 10.78.151.15 with SMTP id y15mr7592644hud; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 05:55:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.180.1 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 05:55:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:55:44 +0700 From: "Mikhail Fursov" To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: =?WINDOWS-1252?Q?Re:_[drlvm]_=93java.compiler=94_property?= In-Reply-To: <2c9597b90610160545n1469bb0ci47e8889f39e32e93@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_45638_9887075.1161003344145" References: <2c9597b90610130555r514c525bhed9d4cc6acbfbbe7@mail.gmail.com> <2c9597b90610130638y12af65f6x13da9f56f64182ae@mail.gmail.com> <2c9597b90610130723m71b0a63eq6f577729ddcea2d9@mail.gmail.com> <453298CC.8030107@gmail.com> <45337806.4050507@pobox.com> <2c9597b90610160545n1469bb0ci47e8889f39e32e93@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_Part_45638_9887075.1161003344145 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 10/16/06, Alexei Zakharov wrote: > > Moreover, the spec obliges us to do so. The real question is: is it RI > bug or bug in spec? Personally I am for returning non-null values in > all cases. I agree. Just tell me and I will commit the patch for EM(interpreter) and JIT modes. BTW I think that we should create interpreter.emconf file and place all VM properties needed for interpreter into this file. So, in future, when we need to add more interpreter-mode option, we will not affect the EM C++ code. -- Mikhail Fursov ------=_Part_45638_9887075.1161003344145--