Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 96894 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2006 12:09:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Oct 2006 12:09:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 14614 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2006 12:09:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 14569 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2006 12:09:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 14558 invoked by uid 99); 10 Oct 2006 12:09:11 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 05:09:11 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of mike.fursov@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.188 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.188] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 05:09:10 -0700 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c29so278012nfb for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 05:08:49 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=j0gs6idMatVNtSnhR/Q7XKZ/EPo3bDddmNHshhhGB6nJwo3QI3MoPplit7+KaDlLOoCKrmDvFw+ulFwO9xmkE96yCgo3fNEl0TFXgYGUo6HY9oOv1cmgN13Lk6Y0gW30bPAjMce4BqVIJL7loQ6BymvEKw1irDNbPUfuwcHRYfA= Received: by 10.78.203.15 with SMTP id a15mr5757488hug; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 05:08:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.180.1 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 05:08:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 19:08:49 +0700 From: "Mikhail Fursov" To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [drlvm] the big soup of VM properties (HARMONY-1626) In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3102_22995350.1160482129258" References: <4525EB2E.6020301@pobox.com> <452B4D76.8070109@pobox.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_Part_3102_22995350.1160482129258 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 10/10/06, Alexey Varlamov wrote: > > Mikhail, > BTW, what would you say if all JIT-specific properties were kept > separately? E.g. if there were JAVA, VM, JIT types of properties > storage, would it be of some convenience to JIT side? Just curious :) > I think it would be convenient if we can assign them from the command line. Right now we have -Dvm. -Xem. -Djit. -Dgc. set of properties. You propose to emphasize them with -X prefix, so we have -XDvm. -XDem. and -XDgc. as the result. Your approach is better because the namespaces are separated. It's safer and we remove potential problems when a property with the same name appears in user's code. The old approach is better because it's do the same using less entities. -- Mikhail Fursov ------=_Part_3102_22995350.1160482129258--