Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 80727 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2006 19:04:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Oct 2006 19:04:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 70205 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2006 19:04:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 70167 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2006 19:04:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 70062 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2006 19:04:27 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 12:04:26 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of rdasgupt@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.195 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.195] (HELO nz-out-0102.google.com) (64.233.162.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 12:04:24 -0700 Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id v1so473187nzb for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 12:04:04 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=ASxewZ4mCMPMd5N3EARpHSK8MLdf4QfNnALOR8u79ti6/lpESgLFF4Bo4R+gdnGnGnsHpgjN0xUZ+qL97H8JL1b6s6ZuxVJy73Tg3efGxSJUf5FsXPtSbq6kdcKNCSHaa79CyZu2ftb53aA7MvGTGkE+U7A1238sp13vReYmhn4= Received: by 10.65.251.1 with SMTP id d1mr5486835qbs; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 12:04:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.203.19 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 12:04:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51d555c70610131204n706435b8p211685929341a39d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 12:04:03 -0700 From: "Rana Dasgupta" To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org, geir@pobox.com Subject: Re: [drlvm] IPF functionality In-Reply-To: <452FB4D0.5050600@pobox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_29949_11688794.1160766243664" References: <51d555c70610121255y6a60dac4p477fa9a5653b330d@mail.gmail.com> <452EB5A2.2050607@pobox.com> <200610130235.19642.gshimansky@gmail.com> <452F2BF6.4000002@pobox.com> <452F56B2.6030802@pobox.com> <452FB4D0.5050600@pobox.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_Part_29949_11688794.1160766243664 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 10/13/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > > > > This is just one more argument for doing IPF porting in a separate > > branch, > > > at least since some point. > > > > > > I admit that maintaining quality and checking for regressions on new > > > platforms is a separate big problem but I believe we could try to > > avoid it > > > during "incubation" of new platforms. > > > > > > Overall I agree we could wait with branch creation until real problems > > > appear. > > > > > > > Great > > OK, we can then continue as is until the IPF port matures and is ready for running non trivial applications or performance tests. At that point we can decide whether to treat it as a primary platform, in which case, we will need to test on it before committing submissions to the main branch. Or secondary, in which case we branch it and let the IPF submitters control their own destiny. Thanks for the good comments. Rana > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org > > ------=_Part_29949_11688794.1160766243664--