Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of alexei.zakharov@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.182.191 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=ewaHu/tN8HZ8OsR7kpV9wiaqXwnDtZMQ3T64v0LnFGYvQW3TSnMN9bUCuBhEQ4hIaGuQkhP3l7gTkgZHLGw1NrSrjM7VVXPaxmV6NViGpXbdEpPHXOVV7MW7og5SW7S8pCA4n/NIfLkq/lwWgblr3piCbam3nKVBKReMbLfXw9c=
Message-ID: <2c9597b90610130155q7d463d93se501c1e38dcbe439@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 12:55:38 +0400
From: "Alexei Zakharov" <alexei.zakharov@gmail.com>
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [general] version of gcc and other tools
In-Reply-To: <3b3f27c60610121905m4b62e819j96faa96bc436b5b7@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <452BC610.4090001@pobox.com>
	 <469bff730610120234k1a1fc669p94cdb51eb09eea6@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4dd1f3f00610121255n2fca579bte4bb4075928ffba7@mail.gmail.com>
	 <452EB663.7090507@pobox.com>
	 <3b3f27c60610121905m4b62e819j96faa96bc436b5b7@mail.gmail.com>

> I'd prefer to be using ECJ for our compiler, but I haven't heard
> anything lately about getting that back into the build scripts.

Do we still have a problem with it? If so - I've been using ecj for
building the classlib for quite a long time already (without any
tricks with moving ecj jar from one place to another). I believe I've
already posted my configs one or two months ago.

Regards,

2006/10/13, Nathan Beyer <nbeyer@gmail.com>:
> As Geir mentions, there a compiler difference's in Sun's JDK. The
> changes are noticeable between 5.0_7 and 5.0_8. Note: Sun as released
> 5.0_9.
>
> I'd prefer to be using ECJ for our compiler, but I haven't heard
> anything lately about getting that back into the build scripts.
>
> -Nathan
>
> On 10/12/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Weldon Washburn wrote:
> > > My tools are:
> > >
> > > - WindowsXP
> > >    - MSVS .NET 2003
> > >    - ant-1.6.5
> > >    - Sun JDK 1.5.0_07_b03
> > >
> > > - Linux
> > >    - gcc 3.4.5
> > >    - ant-1.6.5
> > >    - IBM JDK 1.5.0_08_b03
> > >    - make 3.8.0
> > >
> > > How about the following first stab at Geir's idea of  "will work" tool
> > > chains?  The idea is to quickly converge the below so that I can call a
> > > vote
> > > on it.
> >
> > I don't think we'll need a vote here - we'll be able to come to
> > agreement without that.
> >
> > >
> > > -WindowsXP on laptop, Windows Server 2003 on servers
> > >     - MSVS .NET 2003
> > >    - ant-1.6.5
> > >    - Java JDK 1.5.0_xxxx
> > >
> > > - Linux
> > >    - gcc 3.4.xxx or higher
> > >    - ant-1.6.5
> > >    - Java JDK 1.5.0_xxxx
> > >    - make 3.8.0 or higher
> >
> >
> > We need a strict version of Java, I think, because IIRC, there was
> > problems with a recent patch level of the compiler from Sun.  I don't
> > remember how that was resolved.
> >
> > I think that we also should try to switch completely to the eclipse
> > compiler, so we can include it as a downloaded dependency, and we all
> > are building using the same thing.
> >
> > also, I'd like to define a "maximum" for the version of gcc/g++  - IOW,
> > we want to test up to 4.x.y, so when 4.x.z appears, we need to test first...
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 10/12/06, Pavel Ozhdikhin <pavel.ozhdikhin@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> To update the statistics, my tools:
> > >>
> > >> - MS Windows Server 2003 / IA32:
> > >>       MSVS .NET 2003
> > >>       ant-1.6.5
> > >>       JRockit JDK 1.5.0_03
> > >>
> > >> - Linux / IA32:
> > >>       gcc 3.3.3
> > >>       GNU make 3.80
> > >>       ant-1.6.5
> > >>       JRockit JDK 1.5.0
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Pavel
> > >>
> > >> On 10/10/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
> > >> > I'm so sick of this gcc problem.
> > >> >
> > >> > Lets decide on the versions for GCC and other tools that "will
> > >> work".  I
> > >> > feel the same way that mark does re that being able to build on
> > >> multiple
> > >> > versions gives a better feeling of goodness and harmony in the universe
> > >> > and I encourage people to work on other versions (I will), but it's
> > >> > gotta be the case that we have a "reference toolchain" - that no matter
> > >> > what, it will work on there, and probably a list of tested versions
> > >> >
> > >> > So, what tools and what versions are people working with ?   here's a
> > >> > partial list of mine :
> > >> >
> > >> > 1) WinXP : Visual Studio .NET 2003
> > >> >
> > >> > 2) Linux x86 :
> > >> >     GCC : 3.4.6
> > >> >     g++ : 3.4.6
> > >> >     make : 3.81b4
> > >> >
> > >> > What are you using?  what other tools should we list?
> > >> >
> > >> > I recently setup a new machine (linux) and now have the complete
> > >> list of
> > >> > stuff that has to be installed (starting from fresh ubuntu6) and will
> > >> > post that on the getting started document on teh website.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > geir


-- 
Alexei Zakharov,
Intel Middleware Product Division

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org