harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Elena Semukhina" <elena.semukh...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [drlvm][kernel] Should we be compatible with RI ThreadGroup bug?
Date Wed, 25 Oct 2006 03:42:49 GMT
On 10/24/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> Just to be clear - does J9 exhibit the same problem as the RI?


Yes, it does. The test passes on J9.


Elena Semukhina wrote:
> > I attached two new patches to HARMONY-1625 which fix the test and copy
> RI
> > bug to drlvm ThreadGroup implementation :(
> > Please review and commit!
> >
> >
> > On 10/17/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Agreed.  Lets match J9 and RI for now.  We can always revisit as it
> will
> >> be logged, right? :)
> >>
> >> Elena Semukhina wrote:
> >> > As everyone keeps silence, I'd suggest to change implementation to be
> >> bug
> >> > compatible with RI.
> >> >
> >> > On 10/15/06, Elena Semukhina <elena.semukhina@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On 10/14/06, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > Elena Semukhina wrote:
> >> >> > > Classlib test ThreadGroupTest.test_setMaxPriorityI() fails
on
> >> DRLVM
> >> >> > because
> >> >> > > it expects behaviour that conflicts with specification.
> >> >> > > The test passes on IBM VME and RI. The issue is reported
at
> >> >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1625 .
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > Actually there is a bug report in
> >> >> > > http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4708197
which
> >> >> > agreed
> >> >> > > that
> >> >> > > this is a bug in RI and it should be fixed.
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > Should we follow RI's behaviour and change drlvm
> >> ThreadGroup.javaor
> >> >> > should
> >> >> > > we fix the test?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I'm off-line at the moment so cannot look at the bug details.
 The
> >> >> > question is whether fixing the 'bug' will likely break any
> >> >> applications?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> This question was discussed in Sun's bug report as well. A JCK test
> >> >> detected this bug. The first evaluation stated that "This is
> >> relatively
> >> >> obscure functionality and it's theoretically possible at that
> changing
> >> >> the
> >> >> behavior will break running apps." The second evaluation suggested
> to
> >> >> fix the implementation rather than change the spec. The bug is in
> >> >> progress
> >> >> since 2002...
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> > Regards,
> >> >> > Tim
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com )
> >> >> > IBM Java technology centre, UK.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> >> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> >> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> Elena
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>



-- 
Thanks,
Elena

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message