harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Pavel Pervov" <pmcfi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [general] JIRA - "port-<platform>" categories for JIRA?
Date Sun, 15 Oct 2006 15:48:27 GMT
Altrenative idea would be to use just architecture name as the first
classification tag for architecture specific issues (including porting to
that arcitecture).
Examples can be: [ipf], [ia32], [em64t], etc.
Example of JIRA could be: "[ipf][classlib][awt] natives build is broken"

Regards,
    Pavel.
On 10/15/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> I was thinking about the recent IPF thread, and was going to add a
> "DRLVM-IPF" category so we can track things easier.
>
> But this is dumb - there are other things for porting, like stuff in
> classlib and the launcher tools (maybe).
>
> Anyway, how does "Port-<platform>" sound as a pattern? so in this case,
> "Port - IPF"
>
> geir
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message