harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mikhail Fursov" <mike.fur...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [drlvm] “java.compiler” property
Date Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:06:23 GMT
Ok, if nobody minds I take this task and will provide the patch in a day or
two.

On 10/16/06, Alexei Zakharov <alexei.zakharov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I agree. Just tell me and I will commit the patch for EM(interpreter)
> and
> > JIT modes.
>
> I agree it will be better if you do this since I'm not very familiar
> with DRLVM code yet. So +1 for you to go ahead.
>
> Regards,
>
> 2006/10/16, Mikhail Fursov <mike.fursov@gmail.com>:
> > On 10/16/06, Alexei Zakharov <alexei.zakharov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Moreover, the spec obliges us to do so. The real question is: is it RI
> > > bug or bug in spec? Personally I am for returning non-null values in
> > > all cases.
> >
> >
> > I agree. Just tell me and I will commit the patch for EM(interpreter)
> and
> > JIT modes.
> > BTW I think that we should create interpreter.emconf file and place all
> VM
> > properties needed for interpreter into this file.
> > So, in future, when we need to add more interpreter-mode option, we will
> not
> > affect the EM C++ code.
>
>
> --
> Alexei Zakharov,
> Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division, Russia
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Mikhail Fursov

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message