harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mikhail Fursov" <mike.fur...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [general] JIRA - "port-<platform>" categories for JIRA?
Date Sun, 15 Oct 2006 23:03:52 GMT
It looks like I really do not understand your proposal about JIRA naming.
I do not know what "category" is. I see the list of independent components
here: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY
and when I create a new issue I can choose only one of the components.
Do you mean that IPF could be a subcomponent of DRLVM?  The first
subcomponent in the our JIRA? If yes I think it's a good solution and it is
not mutually exclusive with the subject prefixes approach.

On 10/16/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
> You missed my point, which was about the naming.
> Being able to use the category tags is much more foolproof than subject
> lines, since you can use more than one at a time, and it's cleanly
> organized...  you can look  at different combinations.
> Do you see what I mean?  In JIRA, we can then choose "DRLVM" and "IPF"
> at the same time, so you can look at all DRLVM issues, or just a subset,
> those for IPF, or all IPF issues, or just classlib issues for IPF, etc...
> geir
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org

Mikhail Fursov

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message