harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mikhail Fursov" <mike.fur...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [drlvm] the big soup of VM properties (HARMONY-1626)
Date Tue, 10 Oct 2006 12:12:23 GMT
BTW what if we will have Java component in future (E.g. MMTk's GC)? Will the
hidden properties accessible from Java?

On 10/10/06, Mikhail Fursov <mike.fursov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/10/06, Alexey Varlamov <alexey.v.varlamov@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Mikhail,
> > BTW, what would you say if all JIT-specific properties were kept
> > separately? E.g. if there were JAVA, VM, JIT types of properties
> > storage, would it be of some convenience to JIT side? Just curious :)
> >
>
> I think it would be convenient if we can assign them from the command
> line.
> Right now we have -Dvm. -Xem. -Djit. -Dgc. set of properties.
> You propose to emphasize them with -X prefix, so we have -XDvm. -XDem. and
> -XDgc. as the result.
> Your approach is better because the namespaces are separated. It's safer
> and we remove potential problems when a property with the same name appears
> in user's code.
> The old approach is better because it's do the same using less entities.
>
>
> --
> Mikhail Fursov




-- 
Mikhail Fursov

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message