harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mikhail Loenko" <mloe...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [general] "multi-subject" JIRAs
Date Wed, 25 Oct 2006 05:17:15 GMT
+1 for separation

Thanks,
Mikhail

2006/10/25, Ilya Neverov <ilya.neverov@gmail.com>:
> Hi All,
>
> I support the idea to have separate JIRA-s for different components.
>
> For tracking such changes spreaded over codebase the JIRA's "subtask"
> feature is very usefull - pls see [1,2]
>
> Thanks
> -Ilya
>
> [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1468
> [2] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1758
>
> On 10/24/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
> > Just a quick note - I have done two DRLVM JIRAs today that also included
> > patches for the classlib tests.
> >
> > I accepted the DRLVM part, and rejected the classlib stuff as I think
> > that it would be cleaner and safer if those proposed changes to the
> > classlib were entered as separate JIRAs and discussed with the classlib
> > experts.
> >
> > I know that as JIRAs evolve,more things get attached, and it's really
> > cool that we're working together on all parts of the project - as we
> > should - but it can make it very confusion, so I wanted to just note
> > this directly.  Comments?
> >
> > geir
> >
>
>
> --
> Thank you.
> Ilya Neverov,
> Intel Middleware Products Division
>

Mime
View raw message