harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Fedotov, Alexei A" <alexei.a.fedo...@intel.com>
Subject RE: [doc] No Doxygen reference for code :(
Date Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:49:03 GMT
Nadya, All,

Suggestion to generate Doxygen from DRLVM code sounds very interesting.
I posted a quick solution for Linux to

If you want to have this integrated into build.xml, it would be great to
define a correct scope. Could you please give more details what do you
expect from the documentation build file? A volunteer can try doing some
things important for you first, and then add new features gradually.

 * Should doxygen build documentation for inter-component interfaces?
 * What are components? I assume vm, jit, gc are out of the question. Is
am execution manager or an interpreter a separate component?
 * Should doxygen build documentation for each component like vm, jit,
interpreter, gc?
 * Should we put documentation into doc/<component>_doc dirs as class
library code does?
 * Should we use the same formatting as a class library documentation?
 * We don't need to process .cpp files in DRLVM source tree, do we?
 * Would each of these choices (inter-component documentation, component
interface documentation) be a separate configuration? If yes, should we
put each result into the separate directory?
 * Should doxygen process .java files in DRLVM source tree? 
 * Should the doxygen documentation be integrated with class library
 * Do you expect to have inheritance diagrams? Do we need to download
Graphviz, or should we expect it preinstalled? 
 * A related question is how many platforms should we support. For
example, should I add downloading and compilation of Graphviz for my
SuSE Linux? 
 * Should we have different documentation for Windows and Linux?
 * If something is optional for now, what should be added in future?
 * Is there any choice for user to affect resulting documentation? 

With best regards,
Alexei Fedotov,
Intel Java & XML Engineering

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Morozova, Nadezhda [mailto:nadezhda.morozova@intel.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 4:34 PM
>To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: [doc] No Doxygen reference for code :(
>Hi everyone,
>I've noticed that there's no API reference documentation for Harmony
>code - generated by Doxygen/Javadoc.  I guess many will agree that
>having API reference is very useful and convenient.
>This issue was discussed a while ago [1] for kernel classes and vmi
>interface in classlib. We agreed to store the Doxygen docs on the
>website by generating them manually from code and placing there. It
>seems that the old version of the docs was removed from SVN but never
>made its way to the website, so it's just NOWHERE now :-(. Let's fix
>AFAIU, we want to have the following:
>1.	Ability to generate docs locally from source code as part of
>build - need to change existing build files or write new ones.
>2.	Ability to see docs on the website - manually copy a local
>bundle of docs to the website and add a link. Geir has been planning to
>include the website into the next snapshot; supplying ready reference
>with it seem nice.
>I can work on item 2 for sure to get a nice config file and patch the
>website to link to our new Doxygen API. Item 1 -fixing the build -
>be more extravagant, so your aid's welcome ;)
>[1] mail thread
>Nadya Morozova

View raw message