harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Rana Dasgupta" <rdasg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [general] POLL : supported platforms
Date Mon, 16 Oct 2006 21:37:58 GMT
 On 10/16/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
> >
> > We're a volunteer project, so "supported" is based on interest in
> > community.  Lets be clear by writing down a set of platforms that we as
> > a community commit to support.
> >
> > I think we can define "support" as - "one or more people in the
> > community tests on that platform on a regular basis, there are users
> > that use that platform, and we have people volunteering to find and fix
> > bugs that specifically affect that platform"
> >
> > Just throw things out there and we'll gather the results and see what's
> > popular.  We'll summarize in 3 days.  Please be clear in indicating what
> > you think should be reported.  Don't vote against anything. To start,
> > using a broad brush :
> >
> >
> > Windows
> > =======
> > Windows XP x86
> >
> > Linux
> > =====
> > Ubuntu 6 x86
> > Ubuntu 5 x86
> > RHEL  (version ?) x86
> > FC (version ?) x86
> > SUSE (verion ?) x86
>
>
My RHEL version is 2.6.9. I have a SUSE version 11. On Windows, I would
suggest both XP and Windows Server 2003. Toolchains are a somewhat othogonal
topic, I think.

As Mikhail points out, we may want to clarify the minimum machine model (
Pentium III in x86 case ). I think we also de facto decided to support EM64T
and IPF on Linux  on other threads.

When Vista is out, we should support it both on 32 and 64 bit.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message