harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ilya Neverov" <ilya.neve...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [general] "multi-subject" JIRAs
Date Wed, 25 Oct 2006 05:15:02 GMT
Hi All,

I support the idea to have separate JIRA-s for different components.

For tracking such changes spreaded over codebase the JIRA's "subtask"
feature is very usefull - pls see [1,2]


[1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1468
[2] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1758

On 10/24/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
> Just a quick note - I have done two DRLVM JIRAs today that also included
> patches for the classlib tests.
> I accepted the DRLVM part, and rejected the classlib stuff as I think
> that it would be cleaner and safer if those proposed changes to the
> classlib were entered as separate JIRAs and discussed with the classlib
> experts.
> I know that as JIRAs evolve,more things get attached, and it's really
> cool that we're working together on all parts of the project - as we
> should - but it can make it very confusion, so I wanted to just note
> this directly.  Comments?
> geir

Thank you.
Ilya Neverov,
Intel Middleware Products Division

View raw message