harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <g...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: [classlib] Preprocessor - CHECKPOINT
Date Wed, 01 Nov 2006 01:31:01 GMT


Nathan Beyer wrote:
> What's the concern about just using the prescribed branching pattern
> for SVN? There are some other nice tricks like "externals" for pulling
> in common files into the working copies of other branches (ala the
> 'concurrent' code in 'standard' that's pulled into 'enhanced' on
> checkout). 

Even the authors of SVN warn people away from using externals.

> I would propose we at least attempt to go down a path of
> investigating a branching.

We should consider everything, but I'd personally rather keep as few 
codelines as possible.

> 
> Regardless, I think we need to settle on our exact requirement first,
> before spending too much time on looking for a solution. For example,
> if logging is a real requirement, but everyone agrees it can be done
> via instrumentation (AspectJ, java.lang.instrument, etc), then are
> there any other requirements that affect the actual source files
> internally? If not, then could all of the other requirements be
> fulfilled by judicious SCM use?
> 
> So, I would suggest we back up a little and just layout all of the
> requirements first, so we can make sure everyone's in agreement about
> the needs.

Exactly - we need use cases (and it's not clear that the logging 
problems have been resolved w/ aspects yet...)

geir

> 
> -Nathan
> 
> On 10/31/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
>> So we all agree that it's not an ideal solution.
>>
>> Can anyone think of anything else?  No one said this was going to be 
>> easy...
>>
>> geir
>>
> 

Mime
View raw message