harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <g...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: [classlib] Preprocessor
Date Tue, 31 Oct 2006 12:27:31 GMT

Tim Ellison wrote:
> Mikhail Fursov wrote:
>> Yes, the main reason I love Java is a power of tools! If you force me to
>> work in notepad instead of IDEA with the only reason that we need a
>> preprocessor I will have a doubt if the solution is reasonable.
> Agreed. And that is a reason why it makes sense to have the original
> source code compilable (as Etienne raised) -- so basic Java tooling can
> still work on the original code even when there are no pre-processor
> helpers around (though of course that would be more painful for the
> developer).

But I'm confused here - I thought we talked about

    code w/ preprocessor statements -> processed code -> jar

as three separate steps, so the code would be able to work with basic 
java tooling if you assembled a src.jar from the processed code.

>> BTW I see from the discussion that AspectJ is considered as possible
>> solution. I'm not a guru in this extension of Java and AFAIK it 
>> allows only to add method-entry/exits code. You can't add logging
>> into the middle of the method. You can't change the method behaviour
>> with it. So the question is: what an improvement we will have with
>> AspectJ?
> You can have pointcuts on a whole number of events, including method
> invocations but also exception handling, field assignments and accesses,
> etc.  But you can only add behavior, you cannot subtract from the
> original code.
> Regards,
> Tim

View raw message