harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <g...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: [classlib] Preprocessor (was Re: [classlib][rmi] Code smell - Thread.sleep() in ActivationGroup method)
Date Mon, 30 Oct 2006 00:38:37 GMT

Chris Gray wrote:
> On Sunday 29 October 2006 14:04, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>> [...]
>> 3) Java ME - We've had some interest (Chris?) in looking at using the
>> Harmony classlib for ME, which can also have some differences that might
>> be most conveniently kept in place in the main codebase.
> Yes, I'm still here and still waiting for an answer to my last mail about 
> bringing Mika to the incubator ...

I thought you were off trying to figure out IP provenance.

>> [...]
>> First, anyone think this is a good idea and second, anyone have any
>> experience with tools in this area?
> For JavaME I think it's the only way we'd be able to maintain a single source 
> tree. We need to be able to "#ifdef out" references to classes we don't have, 
> methods we don't implement, etc..
> That much being said, I don't have a recommendation for a tool to use. Java 
> syntax is sufficiently C-like that cpp is probably do-able, but we'd probably 
> stumble over a whole series of gotcha's, and cpp isn't exactly [deity]'s gift 
> to preprocessing anyway. Maybe one of the aspect-oriented tools (with which I 
> am not at all familiar) could be a better bet?

How?  Doesn't that tend to work on the bytecode?  I know that I'd be 
uncomfortable with anything where there wasn't a clear source tree produced.


> Cheers,
> Chris

View raw message