harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <g...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: Harmony passes 94% on derby tests.
Date Wed, 25 Oct 2006 13:01:31 GMT


Mark Hindess wrote:
> On 25 October 2006 at 18:36, "Vladimir Ivanov" <ivavladimir@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Excellent!
>>
>> I have one more idea: we already have buildtest module. Some time ago we
>> agreed to extends it by coverage and japi scripts (I hope it happens soon:)
>> ). May be we extend it one more time and store here some scripts for
>> automatic run of other-projects unit tests? Seems, in this case we can
>> easily reproduce tests run and enable new platforms.
>>
>> Of cause, we can not cover all application but we can define some list of
>> 'most important application'.
>>
>> Is it OK?
> 
> I think gump will do this?

I'm sure it will, but given we have the infrastructure that we want 
people to run anyway, why not use it?

> 
>> PS. The directory structure may be something like that:
>>
>> builtest
>>     - trunk
>>         - cc
>>         - coverage
>>         - japi
>>         - application_test
>>             - derby
>>             - ant
>>             - etc
>>         - misc (some other scripts)
> 
> I had assumed we'd make separate, optional cruisecontrol jobs to perform
> the coverage/japi/etc reporting.  These jobs would depend on the build
> ant test jobs succeeding. 

I agree.

  Judging by the structure you suggest, it
> seems to me that you may anticipate doing it differently?
> 
> Regards,
>  Mark.
> 
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message